Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26563196›Full record

ReviewCNS drugs2015

Oral Targeted Therapies and Central Nervous System (CNS) Metastases.

Michael P Gabay, Scott M Wirth, Joan M Stachnik, Colleen L Overley, Katie E Long, Linda R Bressler, John L Villano

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in CNS drugs, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Michael P GabayDepartment of Pharmacy Practice, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
Scott M WirthDepartment of Pharmacy Practice, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
Joan M StachnikDepartment of Pharmacy Practice, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
Colleen L OverleyPharmacy Services, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA.
Katie E LongPharmacy Services, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA.
Linda R BresslerDepartment of Pharmacy Practice, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
John L VillanoDepartments of Medicine and Neurology, University of Kentucky, Markey Cancer Center, 800 Rose Street, CC447, Lexington, KY, 40536-0093, USA. jlvillano@uky.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The purpose of our review is to summarize the clinical activity of oral targeted agents against brain metastases. This includes BRAF inhibitors (dabrafenib and vemurafenib), human epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors (lapatinib, gefitinib, erlotinib, and afatinib), multi-kinase angiogenesis inhibitors (sorafenib, sunitinib, pazopanib, and vandetanib), and ALK/c-MET (crizotinib) and ALK/IGF-1 (ceritinib) inhibitors. Effective systemic therapies are needed for long-term benefit in brain metastases and documentation of intracranial activity for many therapies is poor. Our review provides a summary of the literature with pertinent data for clinicians. This is needed as subjects with brain metastases are often prevented from enrolling in clinical trials and investigations focused on systemic therapies for brain metastases are rare.

Indexed as

Administration, OralAntineoplastic AgentsBrain NeoplasmsHumansAntineoplastic Agents

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.