Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26563150›Full record

ArticleMolecular diversity2016

Cathepsin D inhibitors as potential therapeutics for breast cancer treatment: Molecular docking and bioevaluation against triple-negative and triple-positive breast cancers.

Hasitha Shilpa Anantaraju, Madhu Babu Battu, Srikant Viswanadha, Dharmarajan Sriram, Perumal Yogeeswari

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular diversity, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Hasitha Shilpa AnantarajuComputer-Aided Drug Design Laboratory, Department of Pharmacy, Birla Institute of Technology & Science- Pilani, Hyderabad Campus, Shameerpet, R.R. District, Hyderabad, 500078, Telangana, India.
Madhu Babu BattuComputer-Aided Drug Design Laboratory, Department of Pharmacy, Birla Institute of Technology & Science- Pilani, Hyderabad Campus, Shameerpet, R.R. District, Hyderabad, 500078, Telangana, India.
Srikant ViswanadhaIncozen Therapeutics (P)Ltd, Shameerpet, R.R. District, Hyderabad, 500078, Telangana, India.
Dharmarajan SriramComputer-Aided Drug Design Laboratory, Department of Pharmacy, Birla Institute of Technology & Science- Pilani, Hyderabad Campus, Shameerpet, R.R. District, Hyderabad, 500078, Telangana, India.
Perumal YogeeswariComputer-Aided Drug Design Laboratory, Department of Pharmacy, Birla Institute of Technology & Science- Pilani, Hyderabad Campus, Shameerpet, R.R. District, Hyderabad, 500078, Telangana, India. pyogee@hyderabad.bits-pilani.ac.in.
Birla Institute of Technology and Science, Pilani · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The main aim of this study was to discover small molecule inhibitors against Cathepsin D (CatD) (EC.3.4.23.5), a clinically proven prognostic marker for breast cancer, and to explore the mechanisms by which CatD could be a useful therapeutic target for triple-positive and triple-negative breast cancers (TPBC & TNBC). The crystal structure of CatD at 2.5 Å resolution (PDB: 1LYB), which was complexed with Pepstatin A, was selected for computer-aided molecular modeling. The methods used in our study were pharmacophore modeling and molecular docking. Virtual screening was performed to identify small molecules from an in-house database and a large commercial chemical library. Cytotoxicity studies were performed on human normal cell line HEK293T and growth inhibition studies on breast adenocarcinoma cell lines, namely MCF-7, MDA-MB-231, SK-BR-3, and MDA-MB-468. Furthermore, RT-PCR analysis, in vitro enzyme assay, and cell cycle analysis ascertained the validity of the selected molecules. A set of 28 molecules was subjected to an in vitro fluorescence-based inhibitory activity assay, and among them six molecules exhibited >50 % inhibition at 25μM. These molecules also exhibited good growth inhibition against TPBC and TNBC cancer types. Among them, molecules 1 and 17 showed single-digit micromolar GI50 values against MCF-7 and MDA-MB-231 cell lines.

Indexed as

Molecular Docking SimulationCathepsin DCell Cycle CheckpointsCell Line, TumorCell ProliferationCell SurvivalDrug Screening Assays, AntitumorGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticHumansHydrogen-Ion ConcentrationLysosomesProtease InhibitorsProtein ConformationTriple Negative Breast NeoplasmsTumor MicroenvironmentCathepsin DProtease InhibitorsASINEXBreast cancerCatDCathepsin DDockingPharmacophore model

Identifiers

PMID26563150
OpenAlexW2177749515

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.