Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26561852›Full record

ArticlePloS one2015

Coevolved Mutations Reveal Distinct Architectures for Two Core Proteins in the Bacterial Flagellar Motor.

Alessandro Pandini, Jens Kleinjung, Shafqat Rasool, Shahid Khan

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Applications of sequence coevolution in membrane protein biochemistry.Biochimica et biophysica acta. Biomembranes · 2018
    Review
  9. Genomic sequencing-based mutational enrichment analysis identifies motility genes in a genetically intractable gut microbe.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2016
    Article
  10. The Gearbox of the Bacterial Flagellar Motor Switch.Structure (London, England : 1993) · 2016
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Alessandro PandiniDepartment of Computer Science and Synthetic Biology Theme, Brunel University London, Uxbridge UB8 3PH, United Kingdom.
Jens KleinjungMathematical Biology, Francis Crick Institute, Ridgeway, Mill Hill, London NW7 1AA, United Kingdom.
Shafqat RasoolDepartment of Biochemistry, McGill University, Montreal, QC H3G 1Y6, Canada.
Shahid KhanMolecular Biology Consortium, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA 94720, United States of America.
Brunel University of London · GBMcGill University · CAMolecular Biology Consortium · USThe Francis Crick Institute · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council U117581331
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Switching of bacterial flagellar rotation is caused by large domain movements of the FliG protein triggered by binding of the signal protein CheY to FliM. FliG and FliM form adjacent multi-subunit arrays within the basal body C-ring. The movements alter the interaction of the FliG C-terminal (FliGC) "torque" helix with the stator complexes. Atomic models based on the Salmonella entrovar C-ring electron microscopy reconstruction have implications for switching, but lack consensus on the relative locations of the FliG armadillo (ARM) domains (amino-terminal (FliGN), middle (FliGM) and FliGC) as well as changes during chemotaxis. The generality of the Salmonella model is challenged by the variation in motor morphology and response between species. We studied coevolved residue mutations to determine the unifying elements of switch architecture. Residue interactions, measured by their coevolution, were formalized as a network, guided by structural data. Our measurements reveal a common design with dedicated switch and motor modules. The FliM middle domain (FliMM) has extensive connectivity most simply explained by conserved intra and inter-subunit contacts. In contrast, FliG has patchy, complex architecture. Conserved structural motifs form interacting nodes in the coevolution network that wire FliMM to the FliGC C-terminal, four-helix motor module (C3-6). FliG C3-6 coevolution is organized around the torque helix, differently from other ARM domains. The nodes form separated, surface-proximal patches that are targeted by deleterious mutations as in other allosteric systems. The dominant node is formed by the EHPQ motif at the FliMMFliGM contact interface and adjacent helix residues at a central location within FliGM. The node interacts with nodes in the N-terminal FliGc α-helix triad (ARM-C) and FliGN. ARM-C, separated from C3-6 by the MFVF motif, has poor intra-network connectivity consistent with its variable orientation revealed by structural data. ARM-C could be the convertor element that provides mechanistic and species diversity.

Indexed as

MutationAlgorithmsAmino Acid SequenceBacterial ProteinsComputer SimulationCrystallography, X-RayEvolution, MolecularFlagellaModels, GeneticModels, MolecularPhylogenyProtein BindingProtein Interaction MapsProtein Structure, SecondaryProtein Structure, TertiarySalmonellaBacterial ProteinsFlig protein, BacteriaFliM protein, Bacteria

Identifiers

PMID26561852
PMCPMC4642947
OpenAlexW2180072122

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.