Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26561527›Full record

ReviewCerebellum & ataxias2015

Guidelines for treatment of immune-mediated cerebellar ataxias.

Hiroshi Mitoma, Marios Hadjivassiliou, Jérôme Honnorat

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cerebellum & ataxias, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 53 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
53citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
6.9field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

53 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 99 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Hiroshi MitomaDepartment of Medical Education, Tokyo Medical University, Tokyo, Japan.
Marios HadjivassiliouAcademic Department of Neurosciences, Royal Hallamshire Hospital, Sheffield, UK.
Jérôme HonnoratUniversity Lyon 1, University Lyon, Rue Guillaume Paradin, 69372 Lyon, Cedex 08 France ; INSERM, UMR-S1028, CNRS, UMR-5292, Lyon Neuroscience Research Center, Neuro-Oncology and Neuro-Inflammation Team, 7, Rue Guillaume Paradin, 69372 Lyon, Cedex 08 France ; National Reference Centre for Paraneoplastic Neurological Diseases, Hospices civils de Lyon, Hôpital neurologique, 69677 Bron, France ; Hospices Civils de Lyon, Neuro-oncology, Hôpital Neurologique, 69677 Bron, France.
Royal Hallamshire Hospital · GBTokyo Medical University · JPUniversité Claude Bernard Lyon 1 · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Immune-mediated cerebellar ataxias include gluten ataxia, paraneoplastic cerebellar degeneration, GAD antibody associated cerebellar ataxia, and Hashimoto's encephalopathy. Despite the identification of an increasing number of immune-mediated cerebellar ataxias, there is no proposed standardized therapy. We evaluated the efficacies of immunotherapies in reported cases using a common scale of daily activity. The analysis highlighted the importance of removal of autoimmune triggering factors (e.g., gluten or cancer) and the need for immunotherapy evaluation (e.g., corticosteroids, intravenous immunoglobulin, immunosuppressants) and adaptation according to each subtype.

Indexed as

Anti-GAD antibodiesCerebellar ataxiasGluten ataxiaHashimoto’s encephalopathyImmunotherapyParaneoplastic cerebellar degeneration

Identifiers

PMID26561527
PMCPMC4641375
OpenAlexW2178541358

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.