ArticleInternational journal of peptide research and therapeutics2015
Multiple Bacteriophage Selection Strategies for Improved Affinity of a Peptide Targeting ERBB2.
Article in International journal of peptide research and therapeutics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Due to the heterogeneity of ERBB2-expression between tumors and over the course of treatment, a non-invasive molecular imaging agent is needed to accurately detect overall ERBB2 status. Peptides are a highly advantageous platform for molecular imaging, since they have excellent tumor penetration and rapid pharmacokinetics. One limitation of peptides however, is their traditionally low target affinity, and consequently, tumor uptake. The peptide KCCYSL was previously selected from a bacteriophage (phage) display library to bind ERBB2 and did so with moderate affinity of 295 nM. In order to enhance tumor uptake and clinical utility of the peptide, a novel phage microlibrary was created by flanking the parent sequence with random amino acids, followed by reselection using parallel strategies for high affinity and specific ERBB2 binding in an attempt to affinity maturate the peptide. One limitation of traditional phage display selections is difficulty in releasing the highest affinity phages from the target by incubation of acidic buffer. In an attempt to recover high affinity second-generation peptides from the ERBB2 microlibrary, two elution strategies, sonication and target elution, were undertaken. Sonication resulted in an approximately 50-fold enhancement in recovered phage per round of selection in comparison to target elution. Despite the differences in elution efficiency, the affinities of phage-displayed peptides selected from either strategy were relatively similar. Although both selections yielded peptides with significantly improved affinity in comparison to KCCYSL, the improvements were modest, most likely because the parental peptide binding cannot be improved by additional amino acids.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.