ArticleTumour biology : the journal of the International Society for Oncodevelopmental Biology and Medicine2016
The prognosis and clinical characteristics of advanced (malignant) solid pseudopapillary neoplasm of the pancreas.
Article in Tumour biology : the journal of the International Society for Oncodevelopmental Biology and Medicine, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comprehensive Insights into Solid Pseudopapillary Neoplasms of the Pancreas: A Single Center Experience of 64 Surgical Cases.Indian journal of surgical oncology · 2025Article
- First case report of diagnosis of extrapancreatic solid pseudopapillary tumor with SMA invasion in a 47-year-old man: a case report and literature review.Frontiers in surgery · 2024Article
- Solid Pseudopapillary Neoplasms of the Pancreas Across Races Demonstrate Disparities with Comparably Good Prognosis.World journal of surgery · 2022Article
- Solid-Pseudopapillary Neoplasm of the Pancreas: A 63-Case Analysis of Clinicopathologic and Immunohistochemical Features and Risk Factors of Malignancy.Cancer management and research · 2021Article
- Suggested Indications for Enucleation of Solid Pseudopapillary Neoplasms in Pediatric Patients.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2019Article
- Solid pseudopapillary neoplasm of the pancreas showing marked distal atrophy: A case report.International journal of surgery case reports · 2019Article
- Prediction of malignancy and adverse outcome of solid pseudopapillary tumor of the pancreas.World journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2018Review
- Solid pseudopaillary neoplasm of the pancreas: analysis of clinicopathological and immunohistochemical features in 10 cases.International journal of clinical and experimental pathology · 2018Article
- Risk Factors of the Recurrences of Pancreatic Solid Pseudopapillary Tumors: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Journal of Cancer · 2018Article
- LEF1, TFE3, and AR are putative diagnostic markers of solid pseudopapillary neoplasms.Oncotarget · 2017Article
- Solid-Pseudopapillary Tumor of the Pancreas: A Single Center Experience.Gastroenterology research and practice · 2016Article
- Surgical Management of Solid Pseudopapillary Tumor of the Pancreas.JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic SurgeonsArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Until today, there is no consistency about the prognosis and the diagnostic criteria of the "malignant" pancreatic solid pseudopapillary neoplasms (m-SPNs). We here made a retrospective study of 26 such cases and try to give a comprehensive description of their pathological characteristics and clinical course. We found out that among those malignant cases, the most common involved extrapancreatic organ was the duodenum, followed by the spleen and the portal vein. The lymph node and the liver metastasis were also seen in 19 % cases, respectively. Most of the patients were female (22/26). Calcification, foamy cytoplasm, and bizarre nuclei of tumor cells were more common in male patients. Every patient underwent surgical resection and had excellent prognosis. There were two patients who had metastasis to the liver 6 years after excision. The recurrence status correlated with the family history of malignant tumor. No patient died of the disease directly during the mean follow-up time of 73.9 months (21-135 months). Our results supported the idea that the prognosis of the advanced stage SPNs was excellent. The surgical resection seemed effectively enough for these patients. However, all the patients need close follow-ups, especially those who had family history of malignant tumors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
26561472What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.