Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26561344›Full record

ArticlePloS one2015

COGNIZER: A Framework for Functional Annotation of Metagenomic Datasets.

Tungadri Bose, Mohammed Monzoorul Haque, Cvsk Reddy, Sharmila S Mande

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Characteristics ofMicrobiology spectrum · 2024
    Article
  7. Frontiers in microbiology · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Frontiers in microbiology · 2022
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Tungadri BoseBio-Sciences R&D Division, TCS Innovation Labs, Tata Consultancy Services Limited, 54-B, Hadapsar Industrial Estate, Pune, 411013, Maharashtra, India.
Mohammed Monzoorul HaqueBio-Sciences R&D Division, TCS Innovation Labs, Tata Consultancy Services Limited, 54-B, Hadapsar Industrial Estate, Pune, 411013, Maharashtra, India.
Cvsk ReddyBio-Sciences R&D Division, TCS Innovation Labs, Tata Consultancy Services Limited, 54-B, Hadapsar Industrial Estate, Pune, 411013, Maharashtra, India.
Sharmila S MandeBio-Sciences R&D Division, TCS Innovation Labs, Tata Consultancy Services Limited, 54-B, Hadapsar Industrial Estate, Pune, 411013, Maharashtra, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRecent advances in sequencing technologies have resulted in an unprecedented increase in the number of metagenomes that are being sequenced world-wide. Given their volume, functional annotation of metagenomic sequence datasets requires specialized computational tools/techniques. In spite of having high accuracy, existing stand-alone functional annotation tools necessitate end-users to perform compute-intensive homology searches of metagenomic datasets against "multiple" databases prior to functional analysis. Although, web-based functional annotation servers address to some extent the problem of availability of compute resources, uploading and analyzing huge volumes of sequence data on a shared public web-service has its own set of limitations. In this study, we present COGNIZER, a comprehensive stand-alone annotation framework which enables end-users to functionally annotate sequences constituting metagenomic datasets. The COGNIZER framework provides multiple workflow options. A subset of these options employs a novel directed-search strategy which helps in reducing the overall compute requirements for end-users. The COGNIZER framework includes a cross-mapping database that enables end-users to simultaneously derive/infer KEGG, Pfam, GO, and SEED subsystem information from the COG annotations.

resultsValidation experiments performed with real-world metagenomes and metatranscriptomes, generated using diverse sequencing technologies, indicate that the novel directed-search strategy employed in COGNIZER helps in reducing the compute requirements without significant loss in annotation accuracy. A comparison of COGNIZER's results with pre-computed benchmark values indicate the reliability of the cross-mapping database employed in COGNIZER.

conclusionThe COGNIZER framework is capable of comprehensively annotating any metagenomic or metatranscriptomic dataset from varied sequencing platforms in functional terms. Multiple search options in COGNIZER provide end-users the flexibility of choosing a homology search protocol based on available compute resources. The cross-mapping database in COGNIZER is of high utility since it enables end-users to directly infer/derive KEGG, Pfam, GO, and SEED subsystem annotations from COG categorizations. Furthermore, availability of COGNIZER as a stand-alone scalable implementation is expected to make it a valuable annotation tool in the field of metagenomic research. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: A Linux implementation of COGNIZER is freely available for download from the following links: http://metagenomics.atc.tcs.com/cognizer, https://metagenomics.atc.tcs.com/function/cognizer.

Indexed as

Databases, GeneticMetagenomeAlgorithmsHumansMetagenomicsReproducibility of ResultsSequence Analysis, DNASoftwareWorkflow

Identifiers

PMID26561344
PMCPMC4641738

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.