Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26561028›Full record

ArticleMolecular imaging and biology2016

In Vivo Evaluation of a Bombesin Analogue Labeled with Ga-68 and Co-55/57.

Johan Hygum Dam, Birgitte Brinkmann Olsen, Christina Baun, Poul-Flemming Høilund-Carlsen, Helge Thisgaard

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular imaging and biology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Preparation and Evaluation of [Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. PET radiometals for antibody labeling.Journal of labelled compounds & radiopharmaceuticals · 2018
    Review
  12. Cyclotron production and radiochemical separation ofApplied radiation and isotopes : including data, instrumentation and methods for use in agriculture, industry and medicine · 2017
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Johan Hygum DamDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Odense University Hospital, Sdr. Boulevard 29, 5000, Odense, Denmark. Johan.Dam@rsyd.dk.ORCID 0000-0001-6577-7011
Birgitte Brinkmann OlsenDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Odense University Hospital, Sdr. Boulevard 29, 5000, Odense, Denmark.
Christina BaunDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Odense University Hospital, Sdr. Boulevard 29, 5000, Odense, Denmark.
Poul-Flemming Høilund-CarlsenDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Odense University Hospital, Sdr. Boulevard 29, 5000, Odense, Denmark.
Helge ThisgaardDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Odense University Hospital, Sdr. Boulevard 29, 5000, Odense, Denmark.
Odense University Hospital · DKUniversity of Southern Denmark · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe purpose of this study was to apply an analogue of bombesin, NOTA-AMBA, labeled with Co-55 or Ga-68, for preclinical imaging of prostate cancer. PROCEDURES: The peptide NOTA-AMBA was labeled with Ga-68 or Co-55 by microwave irradiation. Biodistribution in xenograft mice (PC3) was performed at 1, 4, and 24 h (only cobalt at 24 h) using a fixed amount of peptide. Four weeks post-inoculation, xenograft mice were positron emission tomography/X-ray computed tomography scanned after tail vein injection of [(68)Ga]NOTA-AMBA or [(55)Co]NOTA-AMBA.

resultsLabeling with Ga-68 and Co-55/57 was achieved in yields greater than 90 %. A radiochemical purity (RCP) of 95 and 90 % were obtained for Ga-68 and Co-55, respectively. Both radiopeptides showed high uptake in the intestines, stomach, pancreas, and in the tumor ([(68)Ga]NOTA-AMBA, 10.3 %ID/g at 1 h to 6.4 %ID/g at 4 h; [(57)Co]NOTA-AMBA, 8.2 %ID/g at 1 h to 5.3%ID/g at 24 h). Normal tissue cleared over time improving tumor-to-background ratios.

conclusionsNOTA-AMBA was labeled in high yields and RCP with Ga-68 and Co-55/57. High tumor uptake in a subcutaneous mouse prostate cancer model was observed. At 24 h, [(55/57)Co]NOTA-AMBA showed better tumor-to-organ ratios than [(68)Ga]NOTA-AMBA at both 1 and 4 h post-injection. Hence, for imaging, [(55)Co]NOTA-AMBA was found to be superior compared to [(68)Ga]NOTA-AMBA.

Indexed as

AnimalsBinding, CompetitiveBombesinCell Line, TumorChromatography, High Pressure LiquidCobalt RadioisotopesGallium RadioisotopesHumansInhibitory Concentration 50MaleMice, SCIDPeptidesPositron-Emission TomographyProtein StabilityRadiopharmaceuticalsTissue DistributionBombesinCobalt RadioisotopesGallium RadioisotopesPeptidesRadiopharmaceuticalsAMBABombesinCobalt-55Gallium-68PETPositron emission tomographyProstate cancer

Identifiers

PMID26561028
OpenAlexW2261710012

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.