ArticleEndocrine2016
Giant prolactinomas: are they really different from ordinary macroprolactinomas?
Article in Endocrine, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
28 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 92 citations in OpenAlex.
- Giant prolactinomas, a detailed analysis of 196 adult cases.Pituitary · 2023Pooled it
- Giant prolactinoma in children and adolescents: a single-center experience and systematic review.Pituitary · 2022Pooled it
- Treatment of multiresistant prolactinomas with a combination of cabergoline and octreotide LAR.Endocrine · 2018Trial
- Ultra-rapid prolactin normalization with cabergoline in a premenopausal woman with epilepsy and giant prolactinoma.JCEM case reports · 2026Article
- The Differences Between Dopamine Agonist-Resistant and -Non-Resistant Prolactinomas: Are There Any Predictors of a Good Response?Biomedicines · 2026Article
- Long-term primary pharmacotherapy of giant prolactinomas: A comparison of different cabergoline dosages.Journal of clinical & translational endocrinology · 2025Article
- Impact of Tumor Size on Prolactinoma Characteristics and Treatment Outcomes: A Study of a Tunisian Cohort.Biomedicines · 2025Article
- Good response rates and predictors during the first year of cabergoline treatment in large invasive prolactinomas.Pituitary · 2025Article
- Prolactin-secreting pituitary adenomas: male-specific differences in pathogenesis, clinical presentation and treatment.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2024Review
- Long-term Follow-up of 84 Patients With Giant Prolactinomas-A Swedish Nationwide Study.The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism · 2023Article
- Current and Perspective Approaches to the Treatment of Prolactinomas.Acta medica Lituanic · 2023Review
- De Novo Psychiatric Disorders in a Woman With Giant Prolactinoma Treated With Cabergoline.Clinical medicine insights. Case reports · 2023Article
- Article
- Article
- Are dopamine agonists still the first-choice treatment for prolactinoma in the era of endoscopy? A systematic review and meta-analysis.Chinese neurosurgical journal · 2022Article
- Comparison of the effects of medical and surgical treatments in giant prolactinoma: a single-center experience.Hormones (Athens, Greece) · 2021Article
- Fertility issues in aggressive pituitary tumors.Reviews in endocrine & metabolic disorders · 2020Review
- Prolactinomas in males: any differences?Pituitary · 2020Review
- The Treatment of Refractory Pituitary Adenomas.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2019Review
- Giant pituitary adenoma: histological types, clinical features and therapeutic approaches.Endocrine · 2018Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Giant prolactinomas (gPRLomas) are rare tumors of the lactotroph defined by an unusually large size (>4 cm) and serum PRL levels >1000 ng/mL. The purpose of this study is to characterize the clinical spectrum of gPRLomas comparing them with non-giant prolactinomas. This is a retrospective study at a large referral center. Data from patients harboring gPRLomas and macroprolactinomas were retrieved from medical records of the Prolactinoma Clinic. Analysis was focused on clinical, biochemical, and tumor volume characteristics, as well as on the response to treatment with dopamine agonists. Among 292 patients with prolactinomas followed between 2008 and 2015, 47 (16 %) met the diagnostic criteria for gPRLomas (42 males). The most common complaint was a visual field defect; headache was reported by 79 % and sexual dysfunction was present in over half of the patients. Median basal PRL level and tumor volume were 6667 ng/mL (3750-10,000) and 32 cm(3) (20-50), respectively; hypogonadotropic hypogonadism was documented in 87 %. Cabergoline treatment resulted in the normalization of PRL levels in 68 % and in the reduction of >50 % in tumor volume in 87 % of the gPRLoma patients. The composite goal of PRL normalization and >50 % tumor reduction was achieved by 55 % (n = 26) of patients with gPRL and by 66 % (n = 100) of patients with no giant macroprolactinomas (p = 0.19). Recovery of hypogonadism and improvement of visual fields defects occurred in 32 % and 68 % of the patients, respectively. Cabergoline treatment was equally effective in patients with gPRLoma and those with macroprolactinomas in regard of achieving treatment goals, although the median CBG dose was slightly higher in the gPRLoma group (2 vs. 1.5 mg/w). Six patients required surgery. Beyond their impressive dimensions and the huge amount of PRL they secrete, the clinical behavior of gPRLoma is not different from macroprolactinomas. These tumors are highly responsive to cabergoline treatment, and pituitary surgery is seldom required.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.