Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26560984›Full record

ArticleMemorias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz2015

Waterborne toxoplasmosis investigated and analysed under hydrogeological assessment: new data and perspectives for further research.

Flávia Pereira Vieira, Maria da Glória Alves, Livia Mattos Martins, Alba Lucínia Peixoto Rangel, Jitender Prakash Dubey, Dolores Hill, Lilian Maria Garcia Bahia-Oliveira

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Memorias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Limited value of current and newFrontiers in parasitology · 2023
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Identification of Oocyst-DrivenMicroorganisms · 2021
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Environmental transmission ofFood and waterborne parasitology · 2019
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Toxoplasma gondii in the Food Supply.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2017
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Flávia Pereira VieiraLaboratório de Biologia do Reconhecer, Centro de Biociências e Biotecnologia, Universidade Estadual do Norte Fluminense Darcy Ribeiro, Campos dos Goytacazes, RJ, Brasil.
Maria da Glória AlvesLaboratório de Engenharia Civil, Centro de Ciência e Tecnologia, Universidade Estadual do Norte Fluminense Darcy Ribeiro, Campos dos Goytacazes, RJ, Brasil.
Livia Mattos MartinsLaboratório de Biologia do Reconhecer, Centro de Biociências e Biotecnologia, Universidade Estadual do Norte Fluminense Darcy Ribeiro, Campos dos Goytacazes, RJ, Brasil.
Alba Lucínia Peixoto RangelLaboratório de Biologia do Reconhecer, Centro de Biociências e Biotecnologia, Universidade Estadual do Norte Fluminense Darcy Ribeiro, Campos dos Goytacazes, RJ, Brasil.
Jitender Prakash DubeyAnimal Parasitic Diseases Laboratory, Beltsville Agricultural Research Center, United States Department of Agriculture, Beltsville, MD, USA.
Dolores HillAnimal Parasitic Diseases Laboratory, Beltsville Agricultural Research Center, United States Department of Agriculture, Beltsville, MD, USA.
Lilian Maria Garcia Bahia-OliveiraLaboratório de Imunoparasitologia, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Macaé, RJ, Brasil.
State University of Norte Fluminense · BRBeltsville Agricultural Research Center · USUnited States Department of Agriculture · USUniversidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We present a set of data on human and chicken Toxoplasma gondii seroprevalence that was investigated and analysed in light of groundwater vulnerability information in an area endemic for waterborne toxoplasmosis in Brazil. Hydrogeological assessment was undertaken to select sites for water collection from wells for T. gondii oocyst testing and for collecting blood from free-range chickens and humans for anti-T. gondii serologic testing. Serologic testing of human specimens was done using conventional commercial tests and a sporozoite-specific embryogenesis-related protein (TgERP), which is able to differentiate whether infection resulted from tissue cysts or oocysts. Water specimens were negative for the presence of viable T. gondii oocysts. However, seroprevalence in free-range chickens was significantly associated with vulnerability of groundwater to surface contamination (p < 0.0001; odds ratio: 4.73, 95% confidence interval: 2.18-10.2). Surprisingly, a high prevalence of antibodies against TgERP was detected in human specimens, suggesting the possibility of a continuous contamination of drinking water with T. gondii oocysts in this endemic setting. These findings and the new proposed approach to investigate and analyse endemic toxoplasmosis in light of groundwater vulnerability information associated with prevalence in humans estimated by oocyst antigens recognition have implications for the potential role of hydrogeological assessment in researching waterborne toxoplasmosis at a global scale.

Indexed as

OocystsAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAnimalsAntibodies, ProtozoanAntigens, ProtozoanBrazilChickensChildEnzyme-Linked Immunosorbent AssayFemaleFresh WaterHumansMaleAntibodies, ProtozoanAntigens, ProtozoanProtozoan Proteins

Identifiers

PMID26560984
PMCPMC4660623
OpenAlexW2261699035

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.