Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26560885›Full record

SynthesisChild's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery2016

Comparison of the use of ventricular access devices and ventriculosubgaleal shunts in posthaemorrhagic hydrocephalus: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Daniel M Fountain, Aswin Chari, Dominic Allen, Greg James

Open access · hybridAbstract readComparative StudyMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Comparing ventricular access devices and ventriculosubgaleal shunts for posthemorrhagic ventricular dilatation: systematic review and meta-analysis.Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery · 2025
    Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Two cases of syringomyelia after ventriculosubgaleal shunt.Journal of surgical case reports · 2026
    Article
  5. Effectiveness of neuronavigation-assisted ventriculosubgaleal shunt implantation in a hydrocephalus rabbit model and shunt design.Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery · 2026
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Neurodevelopmental outcomes of neonatal posthemorrhagic hydrocephalus and psychological effects on the parents.Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Effect of surgical treatment on prognosis in preterm infants with obstructive hydrocephalus.Zhongguo dang dai er ke za zhi = Chinese journal of contemporary pediatrics · 2021
    Article
  13. Intraventricular haemorrhage and posthaemorrhagic ventricular dilatation: moving beyond CSF diversion.Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery · 2021
    Review
  14. Ventriculo-subgaleal shunts-broadening the horizons: an institutional experience.Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery · 2021
    Article
  15. Unexpected eosinophilia in children affected by hydrocephalus accompanied with shunt infection.Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery · 2018
    Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Daniel M FountainSchool of Clinical Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Aswin ChariVictor Horsley Department of Neurosurgery, National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, London, UK. aswinchari@gmail.com.
Dominic AllenSchool of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Greg JamesDepartment of Neurosurgery, Great Ormond Street Hospital, London, UK.
Imperial College London · GBNational Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery · GBUniversity College London · GBUniversity of Cambridge · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionVentricular access devices (VAD) and ventriculosubgaleal shunts (VSGS) are currently both used as temporising devices to affect CSF drainage in neonatal posthaemorrhagic hydrocephalus (PHH), without clear evidence of superiority of either procedure. In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we compared the VSGS and VAD regarding complication rates, ventriculoperitoneal shunt conversion and infection rates, and mortality and long-term disability.

methodsThe review was registered with the PROSPERO international prospective register of systematic reviews (registration number CRD42015019750) and was conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. RESULTS AND

conclusionsThe literature search of five databases identified 338 publications, of which 5 met the inclusion criteria. All were retrospective cohort studies (evidence class 3b and 4). A significantly lower proportion of patients with a VSGS required CSF tapping compared to patients with a VAD (log OR -4.43, 95% CI -6.14 to -2.72). No other significant differences between the VAD and VSGS were identified in their rates of infection (log OR 0.03, 95% CI -0.77 to 0.84), obstruction (log OR 1.25, 95% CI -0.21 to 2.71), ventriculoperitoneal shunt dependence (log OR -0.06, 95% CI -0.93 to 0.82), subsequent shunt infection (log OR 0.23, 95% CI -0.61 to 1.06), mortality (log OR 0.37, 95% CI -0.95 to 1.70) or long-term disability (p = 0.9). In all studies, there was a lack of standardised criteria, variations between surgeons in heterogeneous cohorts of limited sample size and a lack of neurodevelopmental follow-up. This affirms the importance of an ongoing multicentre, prospective pilot study comparing these two temporising procedures to enable a more robust comparison.

Indexed as

Cerebral VentriclesEquipment and SuppliesCerebrospinal Fluid ShuntsHumansHydrocephalusInfant, NewbornInfant, Premature, DiseasesIntracranial HemorrhagesVentriculoperitoneal ShuntIntraventricular haemorrhagePosthaemorrhagic hydrocephalusVentricular access deviceVentriculosubgaleal shunt

Identifiers

PMID26560885
PMCPMC4749661
OpenAlexW2137861288

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.