Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26560752›Full record

Observational studyBMC family practice2015

How psychosocial factors affect well-being of practice assistants at work in general medical care?--a questionnaire survey.

Katja Goetz, Sarah Berger, Amina Gavartina, Stavria Zaroti, Joachim Szecsenyi

Open access · goldAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in BMC family practice, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Consequences of Circadian Disruption in Shift Workers on Chrononutrition and their Psychosocial Well-Being.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Desired improvements of working conditions among medical assistants in Germany: a cross-sectional study.Journal of occupational medicine and toxicology (London, England) · 2019
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Katja GoetzDepartment of General Practice and Health Services Research, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Vosstr. 2, Building 37, Heidelberg, D - 69115, Germany. katja.goetz@med.uni-heidelberg.de.
Sarah BergerDepartment of General Practice and Health Services Research, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Vosstr. 2, Building 37, Heidelberg, D - 69115, Germany. sarah.berger@med.uni-heidelberg.de.
Amina GavartinaDepartment of General Practice and Health Services Research, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Vosstr. 2, Building 37, Heidelberg, D - 69115, Germany. amina.Gavartina@gmx.de.
Stavria ZarotiDepartment of General Practice and Health Services Research, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Vosstr. 2, Building 37, Heidelberg, D - 69115, Germany. stavria.zaroti@gmail.com.
Joachim SzecsenyiDepartment of General Practice and Health Services Research, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Vosstr. 2, Building 37, Heidelberg, D - 69115, Germany. joachim.szecsenyi@med.uni-heidelberg.de.
Heidelberg University · DEUniversity Hospital Heidelberg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWell-being at work is an important aspect of a workforce strategy. The aim of the study was to explore and evaluate psychosocial factors and health and work-related outcomes of practices assistants depending on their employment status in general medical practices.

methodsThis observational study was based on a questionnaire survey to evaluate psychosocial aspects at work in general medical practices. A standardized questionnaire was used, the Copenhagen Psychosocial Questionnaire (COPSOQ). Beside descriptive analyses linear regression analyses were performed for each health and work-related outcome scale of the COPSOQ.

results586 practice assistants out of 794 respondents (73.8 %) from 234 general medical practices completed the questionnaire. Practice assistants reported the highest scores for the psychosocial factor 'sense of community' (mean = 85.9) and the lower score for 'influence at work' (mean = 41.2). Moreover, practice assistants who worked part-time rated their psychosocial factors at work and health-related outcomes more positively than full-time employees. Furthermore, the two scales of health related outcomes 'burnout' and 'job satisfaction' showed strong associations between different psychosocial factors and socio-demographic variables.

conclusionsPsychosocial factors at work influence well-being at work and could be strong risk factors for poor health and work-related outcomes. Effective management of these issues could have an impact on the retention and recruitment of health care staff.

Indexed as

Emotional AdjustmentAdultBurnout, ProfessionalFemaleGeneral PracticeHumansJob SatisfactionMalePhysician AssistantsPsychologySurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID26560752
PMCPMC4642745
OpenAlexW2179059554

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.