ArticlePloS one2015
Automatic Fall Detection System Based on the Combined Use of a Smartphone and a Smartwatch.
Article in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
30 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Smartphones and Threshold-Based Monitoring Methods Effectively Detect Falls Remotely: A Systematic Review.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Pooled it
- Healthcare Applications of Smart Watches. A Systematic Review.Applied clinical informatics · 2016Pooled it
- Analysis of a Smartphone-Based Architecture with Multiple Mobility Sensors for Fall Detection.PloS one · 2016Trial
- Intelligent fall risk prediction and real-time warning system for elderly care based on multimodal deep learning and wearable sensor fusion.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- A Comparative Overview of Technological Advances in Fall Detection Systems for Elderly People.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Wearable Technologies for Health Promotion and Disease Prevention in Older Adults: Systematic Scoping Review and Evidence Map.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Article
- Digital remote monitoring of people with multiple sclerosis.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Review
- The Value of Smartwatches in the Health Care Sector for Monitoring, Nudging, and Predicting: Viewpoint on 25 Years of Research.Journal of medical Internet research · 2024Review
- Analyzing Optimal Wearable Motion Sensor Placement for Accurate Classification of Fall Directions.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- PIPTO: Precise Inertial-Based Pipeline for Threshold-Based Fall Detection Using Three-Axis Accelerometers.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Using a Hybrid Neural Network and a Regularized Extreme Learning Machine for Human Activity Recognition with Smartphone and Smartwatch.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Virtual Breathalyzer: Towards the Detection of Intoxication Using Motion Sensors of Commercial Wearable Devices.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Effectiveness of a Smartwatch App in Detecting Induced Falls: Observational Study.JMIR formative research · 2022Article
- A Review of Artificial Intelligence and Robotics in Transformed Health Ecosystems.Frontiers in medicine · 2022Article
- Support Vector Machine Classifiers Show High Generalizability in Automatic Fall Detection in Older Adults.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- A Feasibility Study of the Use of Smartwatches in Wearable Fall Detection Systems.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- [Artificial intelligence in neurocritical care].Der Nervenarzt · 2021Review
- A Machine Learning Multi-Class Approach for Fall Detection Systems Based on Wearable Sensors with a Study on Sampling Rates Selection.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Innovative Head-Mounted System Based on Inertial Sensors and Magnetometer for Detecting Falling Movements.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Article
- An Energy-Efficient Fall Detection Method Based on FD-DNN for Elderly People.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Due to their widespread popularity, decreasing costs, built-in sensors, computing power and communication capabilities, Android-based personal devices are being seen as an appealing technology for the deployment of wearable fall detection systems. In contrast with previous solutions in the existing literature, which are based on the performance of a single element (a smartphone), this paper proposes and evaluates a fall detection system that benefits from the detection performed by two popular personal devices: a smartphone and a smartwatch (both provided with an embedded accelerometer and a gyroscope). In the proposed architecture, a specific application in each component permanently tracks and analyses the patient's movements. Diverse fall detection algorithms (commonly employed in the literature) were implemented in the developed Android apps to discriminate falls from the conventional activities of daily living of the patient. As a novelty, a fall is only assumed to have occurred if it is simultaneously and independently detected by the two Android devices (which can interact via Bluetooth communication). The system was systematically evaluated in an experimental testbed with actual test subjects simulating a set of falls and conventional movements associated with activities of daily living. The tests were repeated by varying the detection algorithm as well as the pre-defined mobility patterns executed by the subjects (i.e., the typology of the falls and non-fall movements). The proposed system was compared with the cases where only one device (the smartphone or the smartwatch) is considered to recognize and discriminate the falls. The obtained results show that the joint use of the two detection devices clearly increases the system's capability to avoid false alarms or 'false positives' (those conventional movements misidentified as falls) while maintaining the effectiveness of the detection decisions (that is to say, without increasing the ratio of 'false negatives' or actual falls that remain undetected).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.