Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26560732›Full record

Trial reportEuropean radiology2016

Computer tomography colonography participation and yield in patients under surveillance for 6-9 mm polyps in a population-based screening trial.

Charlotte J Tutein Nolthenius, Thierry N Boellaard, Margriet C de Haan, C Yung Nio, Maarten G J Thomeer, Shandra Bipat, Alexander D Montauban van Swijndregt, Marc J van de Vijver, Katharina Biermann, Ernst J Kuipers and 2 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in European radiology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Screening and Surveillance of Colorectal Cancer Using CT Colonography.Current treatment options in gastroenterology · 2017
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Charlotte J Tutein NoltheniusDepartment of Radiology, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, PO Box 22700, 1100 DD, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. c.j.tuteinnolthenius@amc.uva.nl.
Thierry N BoellaardDepartment of Radiology, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, PO Box 22700, 1100 DD, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Margriet C de HaanDepartment of Radiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, PO Box 85500, 3508 GA, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
C Yung NioDepartment of Radiology, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, PO Box 22700, 1100 DD, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Maarten G J ThomeerDepartment of Radiology, Erasmus University Medical Center, PO Box 2040, 3000 CA, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Shandra BipatDepartment of Radiology, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, PO Box 22700, 1100 DD, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Alexander D Montauban van SwijndregtDepartment of Radiology, Onze Lieve Vrouwe Gasthuis, PO Box 95500, 1090 HM, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Marc J van de VijverDepartment of Pathology, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, PO Box 22700, 1100 DD, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Katharina BiermannDepartment of Pathology, Erasmus University Medical Center, PO Box 2040, 3000 CA, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Ernst J KuipersDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus University Medical Center, PO Box 2040, 3000 CA, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Evelien DekkerDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, PO Box 22700, 1100 DD, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Jaap StokerDepartment of Radiology, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, PO Box 22700, 1100 DD, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Academic Medical Center · NLErasmus MC · NLOLVG · NLUniversity Medical Center Utrecht · NLUniversity of Amsterdam · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeSurveillance CT colonography (CTC) is a viable option for 6-9 mm polyps at CTC screening for colorectal cancer. We established participation and diagnostic yield of surveillance and determined overall yield of CTC screening. MATERIAL AND

methodsIn an invitational CTC screening trial 82 of 982 participants harboured 6-9 mm polyps as the largest lesion(s) for which surveillance CTC was advised. Only participants with one or more lesion(s) ≥6 mm at surveillance CTC were offered colonoscopy (OC); 13 had undergone preliminary OC. The surveillance CTC yield was defined as the number of participants with advanced neoplasia in the 82 surveillance participants, and was added to the primary screening yield.

resultsSixty-five of 82 participants were eligible for surveillance CTC of which 56 (86.2 %) participated. Advanced neoplasia was diagnosed in 15/56 participants (26.8 %) and 9/13 (69.2 %) with preliminary OC. Total surveillance yield was 24/82 (29.3 %). No carcinomas were detected. Adding surveillance results to initial screening CTC yield significantly increased the advanced neoplasia yield per 100 CTC participants (6.1 to 8.6; p < 0.001) and per 100 invitees (2.1 to 2.9; p < 0.001).

conclusionSurveillance CTC for 6-9 mm polyps has a substantial yield of advanced adenomas and significantly increased the CTC yield in population screening. KEY POINTS: • The participation rate in surveillance CT colonography (CTC) is 86 %. • Advanced adenoma prevalence in a 6-9 mm CTC surveillance population is high. • Surveillance CTC significantly increases the yield of population screening by CTC. • Surveillance CTC for 6-9 mm polyps is a safe strategy. • Surveillance CTC is unlikely to yield new important extracolonic findings.

Indexed as

Population SurveillanceAgedColonic PolypsColonography, Computed TomographicColonoscopyFemaleHumansMaleMass ScreeningMiddle AgedNetherlandsPrevalenceColonic polypsColonography, computed tomographic/methodsColorectal neoplasms/diagnosisMass screening/methodsPatient participation

Identifiers

PMID26560732
PMCPMC4927597
OpenAlexW2179514679

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.