Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26560410›Full record

ArticleSocial science & medicine (1982)2015

Avoiding cancer risk information.

Amber S Emanuel, Marc T Kiviniemi, Jennifer L Howell, Jennifer L Hay, Erika A Waters, Heather Orom, James A Shepperd

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Social science & medicine (1982), 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 52 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
52citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

52 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Physical health mindsets and information avoidance.Journal of behavioral medicine · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Understanding the Process of Family Cancer History Collection and Health Information Seeking.Health education & behavior : the official publication of the Society for Public Health Education · 2023
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Self-efficacy to Get Cancer-Related Information or Advice.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Amber S EmanuelUniversity of Florida, USA. Electronic address: amberemanuel@ufl.edu.
Marc T KiviniemiUniversity at Buffalo, SUNY, USA.
Jennifer L HowellOhio University, USA.
Jennifer L HayMemorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, USA.
Erika A WatersWashington University at Saint Louis School of Medicine, USA.
Heather OromUniversity at Buffalo, SUNY, USA.
James A ShepperdUniversity of Florida, USA.

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Nicholas D Socci · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
Statistics and Data Coordinating CenterU54DE019261 · NIDCR · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI TOMAR, SCOTT L · 2008 to 2012
$5.4M
DONT KNOW RESPONSES TO PERCEIVED RISK ITEMS: IMPLICATION FOR HEALTH BEHAVIORR03CA177775 · NCI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI WATERS, ERIKA A · 2014 to 2015
$186k
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748NCI NIH HHS R03 CA177775NCI NIH HHS R03CA17777501A1NIDCR NIH HHS 1U54DE019261-01NIDCR NIH HHS U54 DE019261
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

rationalePerceived risk for health problems such as cancer is a central construct in many models of health decision making and a target for behavior change interventions. However, some portion of the population actively avoids cancer risk information. The prevalence of, explanations for, and consequences of such avoidance are not well understood.

objectiveWe examined the prevalence and demographic and psychosocial correlates of cancer risk information avoidance preference in a nationally representative sample. We also examined whether avoidance of cancer risk information corresponds with avoidance of cancer screening.

resultsBased on our representative sample, 39% of the population indicated that they agreed or strongly agreed that they would "rather not know [their] chance of getting cancer." This preference was stronger among older participants, female participants, and participants with lower levels of education. Preferring to avoid cancer risk information was stronger among participants who agreed with the beliefs that everything causes cancer, that there's not much one can do to prevent cancer, and that there are too many recommendations to follow. Finally, the preference to avoid cancer risk information was associated with lower levels of screening for colon cancer.

conclusionThese findings suggest that cancer risk information avoidance is a multi-determined phenomenon that is associated with demographic characteristics and psychosocial individual differences and also relates to engagement in cancer screening.

Indexed as

Information Seeking BehaviorAdultAge FactorsEarly Detection of CancerEducational StatusFemaleHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasmsRisk FactorsSex FactorsSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung AdultCancer riskCancer screeningInformation avoidanceRisk perception

Identifiers

PMID26560410
PMCPMC4689624

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.