SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2015
Duration of treatment for asymptomatic bacteriuria during pregnancy.
Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02911662 (Treatment of Asymptomatic Bacteriuria in Pregnancy), which is not on this map. Cited by 16 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Treatment of Asymptomatic Bacteriuria in Pregnancy
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 140 citations in OpenAlex.
- Treatment Effects in Randomized and Nonrandomized Studies of Pharmacological Interventions: A Meta-Analysis.JAMA network open · 2024Pooled it
- Interventions during pregnancy to prevent preterm birth: an overview of Cochrane systematic reviews.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2018Pooled it
- Uncomplicated Bacterial Community-Acquired Urinary Tract Infection in Adults.Deutsches Arzteblatt international · 2017Guideline
- Analgesic effects of LI4 acupuncture during intrauterine device insertion: a randomized controlled clinical trial.Archives of gynecology and obstetrics · 2023Trial
- Real world drug treatment models for pregnancy complicated with urinary tract infection in China from 2018 to 2022: a cross-section analysis.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2024Article
- Mixed Bacterial Growth in Prenatal Urine Cultures; An Investigation into Prevalence, Contributory Factors and the Impact of education-based Interventions.Maternal and child health journal · 2023Observational
- Which Antibiotic for Urinary Tract Infections in Pregnancy? A Literature Review of International Guidelines.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Review
- [Preventive activities in women. PAPPS update 2022].Atencion primaria · 2022Article
- Interventions for the prevention of spontaneous preterm birth: a scoping review of systematic reviews.BMJ open · 2022Article
- Characteristics of Women with Urinary Tract Infection in Pregnancy.Journal of women's health (2002) · 2021Article
- Bacterial Profile and asymptomatic bacteriuria among pregnant women in Africa: A systematic review and meta analysis.EClinicalMedicine · 2021Article
- [Preventive activities in women's care].Atencion primaria · 2020Article
- CUA guideline on adult overactive bladder.Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada · 2017Article
- A best practice position statement on pregnancy in chronic kidney disease: the Italian Study Group on Kidney and Pregnancy.Journal of nephrology · 2016Review
- Risk factors and predisposing conditions for urinary tract infection.Therapeutic advances in urologyReview
- Efficacy and Safety of Single-dose Fosfomycin for Uncomplicated Urinary Tract Infection in Women: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Journal of mid-life healthReview
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundA previous Cochrane systematic review has shown that antibiotic drug treatment of asymptomatic bacteriuria in pregnant women substantially decreases the risk of pyelonephritis and reduces the risk of preterm delivery. However, it is not clear whether single-dose therapy is as effective as longer conventional antibiotic treatment.
objectivesTo assess the effects of different durations of treatment for asymptomatic bacteriuria in pregnancy. SEARCH
methodsWe searched the Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group's Trials Register (31 August 2015) and reference lists of identified articles. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomized and quasi-randomized trials comparing antimicrobial therapeutic regimens that differed in duration (particularly comparing single dose with longer duration regimens) in pregnant women diagnosed with asymptomatic bacteriuria. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors independently assessed trials for inclusion and risk of bias, extracted data and checked them for accuracy. We assessed the quality of the evidence using the GRADE approach. MAIN
resultsWe included 13 studies, involving 1622 women. All were comparisons of single-dose treatment with short-course (four- to seven-day) treatments. The risk of bias of trials included in this review was largely unclear, and most trials were at high risk of performance bias. The quality of the evidence was assessed using the GRADE approach. When the any antibiotic agent was used, the 'no cure' rate for asymptomatic bacteriuria in pregnant women was slightly lower for the short-course treatment over the single-dose treatment, although there was evidence of statistical heterogeneity (average risk ratio (RR) 1.28, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.87 to 1.88; women = 1502, studies = 13; I² = 56%; very low quality evidence). Data from only good quality trials also showed better cure rates with short (four- to seven-day) regimens of the same microbial agent (average RR 1.72, 95% CI 1.27 to 2.33; women = 803, studies = two; I² = 0%; high quality evidence). There was no clear difference in the recurrence of asymptomatic bacteriuria rate between treatment and control groups, whether the same or different microbial agents were used (RR 1.13, 95% CI 0.77 to 1.66; 445 women studies = eight; I² = 0%; very low quality evidence). Differences were detected for low birthweight babies, favoring a short course (four- to seven-day treatment) of the same microbial agent, although the data come from a single trial (RR 1.65, 95% CI 1.06 to 2.57; 714 women; high quality evidence), but no differences were observed for preterm delivery (RR 1.17, 95% CI 0.77 to 1.78; women = 804; studies = three; I² = 23%; moderate quality) or pyelonephritis (RR 3.09, 95% CI 0.54 to 17.55; women = 102; studies = two; I² = 0%; very low quality evidence). Finally, single-dose treatment of any microbial agent was associated with a decrease in reports of 'any side effects' (RR 0.70, 95% CI 0.56 to 0.88; 1460 women, studies = 12; I² = 9%; low quality evidence). Evidence was downgraded for risk of bias concerns in trials contributing data and for imprecise effect estimates (wide confidence intervals crossing the line of no effect, and in some cases, small studies with few events). AUTHORS'
conclusionsA single-dose regimen of antibiotics may be less effective than a short-course (four- to seven-day) regimen, but more evidence is needed from large trials measuring important outcomes, such as cure rate. Women with asymptomatic bacteriuria in pregnancy should be treated by the standard regimen of antibiotics until more data become available testing seven-day treatment compared with shorter courses of three- or five-day regimens.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.