Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26560174›Full record

ArticleBMC microbiology2015

Oxacillin sensitization of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus pseudintermedius by antisense peptide nucleic acids in vitro.

Shan Goh, Anette Loeffler, David H Lloyd, Sean P Nair, Liam Good

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC microbiology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 46 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Transcriptome-based design of antisense inhibitors potentiates carbapenem efficacy in CREProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Antisense peptide nucleic acids as a potential anti-infective agent.Journal of microbiology (Seoul, Korea) · 2019
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Advances in therapeutic bacterial antisense biotechnology.Applied microbiology and biotechnology · 2018
    Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Shan GohPathology and Pathogen Biology, Royal Veterinary College, Hawkshead Lane, Hatfield, Hertfordshire, UK. sgoh@rvc.ac.uk.
Anette LoefflerClinical Sciences and Services, Royal Veterinary College, Hawkshead Lane, Hatfield, Hertfordshire, UK.
David H LloydClinical Sciences and Services, Royal Veterinary College, Hawkshead Lane, Hatfield, Hertfordshire, UK.
Sean P NairDepartment of Microbial Diseases, UCL Eastman Dental Institute, University College London, London, UK.
Liam GoodPathology and Pathogen Biology, Royal Veterinary College, Royal College Street, London, UK.
Royal Veterinary College · GBUniversity College London · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAntibiotic resistance genes can be targeted by antisense agents, which can reduce their expression and thus restore cellular susceptibility to existing antibiotics. Antisense inhibitors can be gene and pathogen specific, or designed to inhibit a group of bacteria having conserved sequences within resistance genes. Here, we aimed to develop antisense peptide nucleic acids (PNAs) that could be used to effectively restore susceptibility to β-lactams in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus pseudintermedius (MRSP).

resultsAntisense PNAs specific for conserved regions of the mobilisable gene mecA, and the growth essential gene, ftsZ, were designed. Clinical MRSA and MRSP strains of high oxacillin resistance were treated with PNAs and assayed for reduction in colony forming units on oxacillin plates, reduction in target gene mRNA levels, and cell size. Anti-mecA PNA at 7.5 and 2.5 μM reduced mecA mRNA in MRSA and MRSP (p < 0.05). At these PNA concentrations, 66 % of MRSA and 92 % of MRSP cells were killed by oxacillin (p < 0.01). Anti-ftsZ PNA at 7.5 and 2.5 μM reduced ftsZ mRNA in MRSA and MRSP, respectively (p ≤ 0.05). At these PNA concentrations, 86 % of MRSA cells and 95 % of MRSP cells were killed by oxacillin (p < 0.05). Anti-ftsZ PNAs resulted in swelling of bacterial cells. Scrambled PNA controls did not affect MRSA but sensitized MRSP moderately to oxacillin without affecting mRNA levels.

conclusionsThe antisense PNAs effects observed provide in vitro proof of concept that this approach can be used to reverse β-lactam resistance in staphylococci. Further studies are warranted as clinical treatment alternatives are needed.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsBacterial ProteinsCytoskeletal ProteinsDrug SynergismGene Expression Regulation, BacterialIn Vitro TechniquesMethicillin ResistanceMethicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureusMicrobial Sensitivity TestsOxacillinPenicillin-Binding ProteinsPeptide Nucleic AcidsRNA, BacterialRNA, MessengerStaphylococcusAnti-Bacterial AgentsBacterial ProteinsCytoskeletal ProteinsFtsZ protein, BacteriamecA protein, Staphylococcus aureusMecA protein, Staphylococcus pseudintermediusOxacillinPenicillin-Binding ProteinsPeptide Nucleic AcidsRNA, BacterialRNA, Messenger

Identifiers

PMID26560174
PMCPMC4642645
OpenAlexW2176606514

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.