Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26560144›Full record

SynthesisEuropean child & adolescent psychiatry2016

The use of medication in selective mutism: a systematic review.

Katharina Manassis, Beate Oerbeck, Kristin Romvig Overgaard

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in European child & adolescent psychiatry, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.1field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 49 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Youth with selective mutism: a nationwide patient registry study.European child & adolescent psychiatry · 2026
    Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Understanding Selective Mutism in Very Young Children.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Treatment of selective mutism: a 5-year follow-up study.European child & adolescent psychiatry · 2018
    Article
  12. [Selective mutism].Der Nervenarzt · 2018
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Treatment of anxiety disorders.Dialogues in clinical neuroscience · 2017
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Katharina ManassisDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada. kmmanassis@gmail.com.
Beate OerbeckDivision of Mental Health and Addiction, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Kristin Romvig OvergaardDivision of Mental Health and Addiction, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Oslo University Hospital · NOUniversity of Toronto · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite limited evidence, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) and monoamine oxidase inhibitors (MAOIs) are used to reduce symptoms of selective mutism (SM) in children unresponsive to psychosocial interventions. We review existing evidence for the efficacy of these medications, limitations of the literature, and resulting treatment considerations. Bibliographic searches were conducted in Medline, Embase, PsycInfo, Web of Science and Cochrane up to June 2015. Two reviewers independently sought studies of children with SM as primary psychiatric diagnosis, which reported response to medication treatment. Abstracts were limited to those reporting original data. Two reviewers independently assessed the ten papers reporting on >2 subjects regarding study design, key results, and limitations. Heterogeneity of designs mandated a descriptive summary. Symptomatic improvement was found for 66/79 children treated with SSRIs and 4/4 children treated with phenelzine. Only 3/10 studies had unmedicated comparison groups and only two were double-blinded. This review may be affected by publication bias, missed studies, and variability of outcome measures in included studies. Although there is some evidence for symptomatic improvement in SM with medication, especially SSRIs, it is limited by small numbers, lack of comparative trials, lack of consistent measures, and lack of consistent reporting on tolerability. The clinician must weigh this paucity of evidence against the highly debilitating nature of SM, and its adverse effects on the development of those children whose progress with psychosocial interventions is limited or very slow. Studies of optimal dosage and timing of medications in relation to psychosocial treatments are also needed.

Indexed as

ChildHumansMonoamine Oxidase InhibitorsMutismSelective Serotonin Reuptake InhibitorsMonoamine Oxidase InhibitorsSelective Serotonin Reuptake InhibitorsPharmacotherapyReviewSelective mutismSelective serotonin reuptake inhibitors

Identifiers

PMID26560144
OpenAlexW2123689050

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.