Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26560015›Full record

ReviewExpert review of vaccines2016

Immune correlates for dengue vaccine development.

Anon Srikiatkhachorn, In-Kyu Yoon

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Expert review of vaccines, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Human CD4Journal of virology · 2017
    Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Anon Srikiatkhachorna Division of Infectious Diseases and Immunology, Department of Medicine , University of Massachusetts Medical School , Worcester , MA , USA.
In-Kyu Yoonb Dengue Vaccine Initiative , International Vaccine Institute, SNU Research Park , Seoul , Korea.
International Vaccine Institute · KRUniversity of Massachusetts Chan Medical School · US

Funding

VIRAL DETERMINANTS OF SEVERE DENGUE DISEASEP01AI034533 · NIAID · UNIV OF MASSACHUSETTS MED SCH WORCESTER · PI ROTHMAN, ALAN L · 1994 to 2022
$42.0M
NIAID NIH HHS P01 AI034533
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Dengue virus is the leading cause of vector-borne viral disease with four serotypes in circulation. Vaccine development has been complicated by the potential for both protection and disease enhancement during heterologous infection. Secondary infection triggers cross-reactive immune memory responses that have varying functional and epitope specificities that determine protection or risk. Strongly neutralizing antibodies to quaternary epitopes may be especially important for virus neutralization. Cell-mediated immunity dominated by Th1 functions may also play an important role. Determining an immune correlate of protection or risk would be highly beneficial for vaccine development but is hampered by mechanistic uncertainties and assay limitations. Clinical efficacy trials and human infection models along with a systems approach may provide future opportunities to elucidate such correlates.

Indexed as

BiomarkersAntibodies, NeutralizingAntibodies, ViralClinical Trials as TopicDengueDengue VaccinesDengue VirusDrug DiscoveryEpitopesHumansTh1 CellsAntibodies, NeutralizingAntibodies, ViralBiomarkersDengue VaccinesEpitopesantibody-dependent enhancementcell-mediated immunitycorrelate of protectioncorrelate of riskDenguedengue vaccinehuman infection modelhumoral immunitysystems immunologysystems vaccinology

Identifiers

PMID26560015
PMCPMC5523864
OpenAlexW2179339068

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.