Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26559926›Full record

ReviewWiley interdisciplinary reviews. Systems biology and medicine

Systems biology approaches for identifying adverse drug reactions and elucidating their underlying biological mechanisms.

Mary Regina Boland, Alexandra Jacunski, Tal Lorberbaum, Joseph D Romano, Robert Moskovitch, Nicholas P Tatonetti

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Systems biology and medicine. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. A patient safety knowledge graph supporting vaccine product development.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2024
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Observational
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. High-throughput · 2018
    Article
  20. Biomarkers of adverse drug reactions.Experimental biology and medicine (Maywood, N.J.) · 2018
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Mary Regina BolandDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.
Alexandra JacunskiDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.
Tal LorberbaumDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4772-7392
Joseph D RomanoDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.
Robert MoskovitchDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.
Nicholas P TatonettiDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.

Funding

Training in Biomedical Informatics at Columbia UniversityT15LM007079 · NLM · COLUMBIA UNIV NEW YORK MORNINGSIDE · PI NOEMIE ELHADAD, GEORGE M HRIPCSAK · 1992 to 2026
$28.9M
Systematic pharmacological targeting of the core mechanisms responsible for maintaining cancer cell stateU54CA209997 · NCI · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI CALIFANO, ANDREA, HONIG, BARRY H · 2016 to 2021
$10.9M
Drug Effect Discovery Through Data Mining and Integrative Chemical BiologyR01GM107145 · NIGMS · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI TATONETTI, NICHOLAS P · 2014 to 2018
$2.5M
Training Program in Computational BiologyT32GM082797 · NIGMS · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI HONIG, BARRY H · 2008 to 2015
$1.4M
NCI NIH HHS U54 CA209997NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM107145NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM082797NLM NIH HHS T15 LM00707NLM NIH HHS T15 LM007079
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Small molecules are indispensable to modern medical therapy. However, their use may lead to unintended, negative medical outcomes commonly referred to as adverse drug reactions (ADRs). These effects vary widely in mechanism, severity, and populations affected, making ADR prediction and identification important public health concerns. Current methods rely on clinical trials and postmarket surveillance programs to find novel ADRs; however, clinical trials are limited by small sample size, whereas postmarket surveillance methods may be biased and inherently leave patients at risk until sufficient clinical evidence has been gathered. Systems pharmacology, an emerging interdisciplinary field combining network and chemical biology, provides important tools to uncover and understand ADRs and may mitigate the drawbacks of traditional methods. In particular, network analysis allows researchers to integrate heterogeneous data sources and quantify the interactions between biological and chemical entities. Recent work in this area has combined chemical, biological, and large-scale observational health data to predict ADRs in both individual patients and global populations. In this review, we explore the rapid expansion of systems pharmacology in the study of ADRs. We enumerate the existing methods and strategies and illustrate progress in the field with a model framework that incorporates crucial data elements, such as diet and comorbidities, known to modulate ADR risk. Using this framework, we highlight avenues of research that may currently be underexplored, representing opportunities for future work.

Indexed as

AnimalsDrug-Related Side Effects and Adverse ReactionsHumansSystems Biology

Identifiers

PMID26559926
PMCPMC4760887

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.