SynthesisBMC cancer2015
Withdrawal of anticancer therapy in advanced disease: a systematic literature review.
Synthesis in BMC cancer, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
31 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 80 citations in OpenAlex.
- Quality End-of-Life Cancer Care: An Unfulfilled but Achievable Imperative.Current oncology reports · 2025Pooled it
- Shared decision-making in palliative cancer care: A systematic review and metasynthesis.Palliative medicine · 2024Pooled it
- Swallowing disorders and mortality in adults with advanced cancer outside the head and neck and upper gastrointestinal tract: a systematic review.BMC palliative care · 2023Pooled it
- Does ethnicity affect pain management for people with advanced disease? A mixed methods cross-national systematic review of 'very high' Human Development Index English-speaking countries.BMC palliative care · 2022Pooled it
- Preventing adverse events of chemotherapy for gastrointestinal cancer by educating patients about the nocebo effect: a randomized-controlled trial.BMC cancer · 2022Trial
- Trial
- Review
- Modeling Cancer Outcomes and Economic Impact of the Anti-PD-1/PD-L1 Immunotherapy in the Gulf: United Arab Emirates, Oman, and Kuwait.Clinical drug investigation · 2026Article
- Predictive factors for early mortality after regorafenib or trifluridine/tipiracil initiation in metastatic colorectal cancer.The oncologist · 2026Article
- Real-World Treatment Patterns and Outcomes in Patients With Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma and 1-3 Prior Lines of Therapy: Optum Database.Cancer medicine · 2025Article
- The effect of clinician-expressed empathy and nocebo-alleviating information on breast-cancer-patients' anxiety and side effects during active chemotherapy: A clinical feasibility study.PEC innovation · 2025Article
- Review
- Preferences of bereaved family members on communication with physicians when discontinuing anticancer treatment: referring to the concept of nudges.Japanese journal of clinical oncology · 2024Article
- Understanding how shared decision-making approaches and patient aids influence patients with advanced cancer when deciding on palliative treatments and care: A realist review.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2023Review
- Systemic Anticancer Treatment Near the End of Life: a Narrative Literature Review.Current treatment options in oncology · 2023Review
- [Chemotherapy at the end of life is compatible with dignified death and palliative care]Revista de la Facultad de Ciencias Medicas (Cordoba, Argentina) · 2023Article
- Possible alleviation of symptoms and side effects through clinicians' nocebo information and empathy in an experimental video vignette study.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- End-of-life care in cancer patients: how much drug therapy and how much palliative care? Record linkage study in Northern Italy.BMJ open · 2022Article
- Immunotherapy maintenance therapy for advanced urothelial carcinoma (aUC): a comprehensive review.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2022Review
- Differences in ICU Outcomes According to the Type of Anticancer Drug in Lung Cancer Patients.Frontiers in medicine · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCurrent guidelines set out when to start anticancer treatments, but not when to stop as the end of life approaches. Conventional cytotoxic agents are administered intravenously and have major life-threatening toxicities. Newer drugs include molecular targeted agents (MTAs), in particular, small molecule kinase-inhibitors (KIs), which are administered orally. These have fewer life-threatening toxicities, and are increasingly used to palliate advanced cancer, generally offering additional months of survival benefit. MTAs are substantially more expensive, between £2-8 K per month, and perceived as easier to start than stop.
methodsA systematic review of decision-making concerning the withdrawal of anticancer drugs towards the end of life within clinical practice, with a particular focus on MTAs. Nine electronic databases searched. PRISMA guidelines followed.
resultsForty-two studies included. How are decisions made? Decision-making was shared and ongoing, including stopping, starting and trying different treatments. Oncologists often experienced 'professional role dissonance' between their self-perception as 'treaters', and talking about end of life care. Why are decisions made? Clinical factors: disease progression, worsening functional status, treatment side-effects. Non-clinical factors: physicians' personal experience, values, emotions. Some patients continued treatment to maintain 'hope', often reflecting limited understanding of palliative goals. When are decisions made? Limited evidence reveals patients' decisions based upon quality of life benefits. Clinicians found timing withdrawal particularly challenging. Who makes the decisions? Decisions were based within physician-patient interaction.
conclusionsOncologists report that decisions around stopping chemotherapy treatment are challenging, with limited evidence-based guidance outside of clinical trial protocols. The increasing availability of oral MTAs is transforming the management of incurable cancer; blurring boundaries between active treatment and palliative care. No studies specifically addressing decision-making around stopping MTAs in clinical practice were identified. There is a need to develop an evidence base to support physicians and patients with decision-making around the withdrawal of these high cost treatments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.