Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26559809›Full record

ArticleBMC genomics2015

Evaluation of the linkage-disequilibrium method for the estimation of effective population size when generations overlap: an empirical case.

María Saura, Albert Tenesa, John A Woolliams, Almudena Fernández, Beatriz Villanueva

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Genomic scans for diversity and selection signatures in Indian Red Sindhi cattle.Mammalian genome : official journal of the International Mammalian Genome Society · 2025
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Deciphering the regulation of porcine genes influencing growth, fatness and yield-related traits through genetical genomics.Mammalian genome : official journal of the International Mammalian Genome Society · 2017
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

María SauraDepartamento de Mejora Genética Animal, INIA, Carretera de la Coruña km 7.5, 28040, Madrid, Spain. saura.maria@inia.es.
Albert TenesaThe Roslin Institute and R(D)SVS, University of Edinburgh, EH25 9RG, Midlothian, UK. albert.tenesa@ed.ac.uk.
John A WoolliamsThe Roslin Institute and R(D)SVS, University of Edinburgh, EH25 9RG, Midlothian, UK. john.woolliams@roslin.ed.ac.uk.
Almudena FernándezDepartamento de Mejora Genética Animal, INIA, Carretera de la Coruña km 7.5, 28040, Madrid, Spain. afedez@inia.es.
Beatriz VillanuevaDepartamento de Mejora Genética Animal, INIA, Carretera de la Coruña km 7.5, 28040, Madrid, Spain. villanueva.beatriz@inia.es.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWithin the genetic methods for estimating effective population size (N e ), the method based on linkage disequilibrium (LD) has advantages over other methods, although its accuracy when applied to populations with overlapping generations is a matter of controversy. It is also unclear the best way to account for mutation and sample size when this method is implemented. Here we have addressed the applicability of this method using genome-wide information when generations overlap by profiting from having available a complete and accurate pedigree from an experimental population of Iberian pigs. Precise pedigree-based estimates of N e were considered as a baseline against which to compare LD-based estimates.

methodsWe assumed six different statistical models that varied in the adjustments made for mutation and sample size. The approach allowed us to determine the most suitable statistical model of adjustment when the LD method is used for species with overlapping generations. A novel approach used here was to treat different generations as replicates of the same population in order to assess the error of the LD-based N e estimates.

resultsLD-based N e estimates obtained by estimating the mutation parameter from the data and by correcting sample size using the 1/2n term were the closest to pedigree-based estimates. The N e at the time of the foundation of the herd (26 generations ago) was 20.8 ± 3.7 (average and SD across replicates), while the pedigree-based estimate was 21. From that time on, this trend was in good agreement with that followed by pedigree-based N e.

conclusionsOur results showed that when using genome-wide information, the LD method is accurate and broadly applicable to small populations even when generations overlap. This supports the use of the method for estimating N e when pedigree information is unavailable in order to effectively monitor and manage populations and to early detect population declines. To our knowledge this is the first study using replicates of empirical data to evaluate the applicability of the LD method by comparing results with accurate pedigree-based estimates.

Indexed as

Genetics, PopulationLinkage DisequilibriumModels, GeneticModels, StatisticalPopulation DensityAlgorithmsAnimalsCrosses, GeneticDatasets as TopicFemaleGenotypeMalePedigreePolymorphism, Single Nucleotide

Identifiers

PMID26559809
PMCPMC4642667

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.