Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26559715›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of health promotion : AJHP2017

"Get drunk. Smoke weed. Have fun.": A Content Analysis of Tweets About Marijuana and Alcohol.

Melissa J Krauss, Richard A Grucza, Laura J Bierut, Patricia A Cavazos-Rehg

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of health promotion : AJHP, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 63 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Large-Scale Analysis of Online Questions Related to Opioid Use Disorder on Reddit.Proceedings of the ... International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media. International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Interpol review of controlled substances 2016-2019.Forensic science international. Synergy · 2020
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Melissa J Krauss1 Department of Psychiatry, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri.
Richard A Grucza1 Department of Psychiatry, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri.
Laura J Bierut1 Department of Psychiatry, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri.
Patricia A Cavazos-Rehg1 Department of Psychiatry, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri.
Washington University in St. Louis · US

Funding

BUILDING ON BRIDGING THE GAP: ENVIRONMENTAL INFLUENCES ON TEEN SUBSTANCE USER01DA032843 · NIDA · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI CAVAZOS-REHG, PATRICIA A · 2012 to 2015
$1.5M
Implications of social media content and engagement for alcohol and marijuana useR01DA039455 · NIDA · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI CAVAZOS-REHG, PATRICIA A · 2014 to 2017
$1.3M
POLICY AS ENVIRONMENT : LONG-TERM EFFECTS OF LAWS RESTRICTING YOUTH SUBSTANCE USER01DA031288 · NIDA · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI GRUCZA, RICHARD A · 2012 to 2015
$1.1M
Human Genetics of Addiction: A Study of Common and Specific FactorsK02DA021237 · NIDA · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI BIERUT, LAURA J. · 2007 to 2011
$567k
NIDA NIH HHS K02 DA021237NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA031288NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA032843NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA039455
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo explore the sentiment and themes of Twitter chatter that mentions both alcohol and marijuana.

designCross-sectional analysis of tweets mentioning both alcohol and marijuana during 1 month was performed.

settingThe study setting was Twitter.

participantsTweets sent from February 4 to March 5, 2014, were studied.

methodA random sample (n = 5000) of tweets that mentioned alcohol and marijuana were qualitatively coded as normalizing both substances, preferring one substance over the other, or discouraging both substances. Other common themes were identified.

resultsMore than half (54%) of the tweets normalized marijuana and alcohol (without preferring one substance over the other), and 24% preferred marijuana over alcohol. Only 2% expressed a preference for alcohol over marijuana, 7% discouraged the use of both substances, and the sentiment was unknown for 13% of the tweets. Common themes among tweets that normalized both substances included using the substances with friends (17%) and mentioning substance use in the context of sex or romance (14%). Common themes among tweets that preferred marijuana over alcohol were the beliefs that marijuana is safer than alcohol (46%) and preferences for effects of marijuana over alcohol (40%).

conclusionTweets normalizing polysubstance use or encouraging marijuana use over alcohol use are common. Both online and offline prevention efforts are needed to increase awareness of the risks associated with polysubstance use and marijuana use.

Indexed as

Alcoholic IntoxicationConsumer BehaviorCross-Sectional StudiesFriendsHumansMarijuana SmokingSocial MediaHealth focus: social healthOutcome measure: behavioralResearch purpose: descriptiveSetting: nationalSocial Media, Alcohol, Marijuana, Twitter, Prevention Research. Manuscript format: researchStrategy: behavior changeStudy design: content analysisTarget population age: youth, adultsTarget population circumstances: education/income level

Identifiers

PMID26559715
PMCPMC4956592
OpenAlexW2179333661

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.