ArticlePloS one2015
Union Exon Based Approach for RNA-Seq Gene Quantification: To Be or Not to Be?
Article in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.
- The importance of data transformation in RNA-Seq preprocessing for bladder cancer subtyping.BMC research notes · 2025Article
- A consensus molecular subtypes classification strategy for clinical colorectal cancer tissues.Life science alliance · 2024Article
- How tool combinations in different pipeline versions affect the outcome in RNA-seq analysis.NAR genomics and bioinformatics · 2024Article
- The value of genotype-specific reference for transcriptome analyses in barley.Life science alliance · 2022Article
- HRT Atlas v1.0 database: redefining human and mouse housekeeping genes and candidate reference transcripts by mining massive RNA-seq datasets.Nucleic acids research · 2021Article
- 3' MACE RNA-sequencing allows for transcriptome profiling in human tissue samples after long-term storage.Laboratory investigation; a journal of technical methods and pathology · 2020Article
- Evaluation of two main RNA-seq approaches for gene quantification in clinical RNA sequencing: polyA+ selection versus rRNA depletion.Scientific reports · 2018Article
- Profiling RNA-Seq at multiple resolutions markedly increases the number of causal eQTLs in autoimmune disease.PLoS genetics · 2017Article
- Evaluation and comparison of computational tools for RNA-seq isoform quantification.BMC genomics · 2017Article
- RNA sequencing and transcriptome arrays analyses show opposing results for alternative splicing in patient derived samples.BMC genomics · 2017Article
- Mapping eQTLs with RNA-seq reveals novel susceptibility genes, non-coding RNAs and alternative-splicing events in systemic lupus erythematosus.Human molecular genetics · 2017Article
- QuickRNASeq lifts large-scale RNA-seq data analyses to the next level of automation and interactive visualization.BMC genomics · 2016Article
- Differential analyses for RNA-seq: transcript-level estimates improve gene-level inferences.F1000Research · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In recent years, RNA-seq is emerging as a powerful technology in estimation of gene and/or transcript expression, and RPKM (Reads Per Kilobase per Million reads) is widely used to represent the relative abundance of mRNAs for a gene. In general, the methods for gene quantification can be largely divided into two categories: transcript-based approach and 'union exon'-based approach. Transcript-based approach is intrinsically more difficult because different isoforms of the gene typically have a high proportion of genomic overlap. On the other hand, 'union exon'-based approach method is much simpler and thus widely used in RNA-seq gene quantification. Biologically, a gene is expressed in one or more transcript isoforms. Therefore, transcript-based approach is logistically more meaningful than 'union exon'-based approach. Despite the fact that gene quantification is a fundamental task in most RNA-seq studies, however, it remains unclear whether 'union exon'-based approach for RNA-seq gene quantification is a good practice or not. In this paper, we carried out a side-by-side comparison of 'union exon'-based approach and transcript-based method in RNA-seq gene quantification. It was found that the gene expression levels are significantly underestimated by 'union exon'-based approach, and the average of RPKM from 'union exons'-based method is less than 50% of the mean expression obtained from transcript-based approach. The difference between the two approaches is primarily affected by the number of transcripts in a gene. We performed differential analysis at both gene and transcript levels, respectively, and found more insights, such as isoform switches, are gained from isoform differential analysis. The accuracy of isoform quantification would improve if the read coverage pattern and exon-exon spanning reads are taken into account and incorporated into EM (Expectation Maximization) algorithm. Our investigation discourages the use of 'union exons'-based approach in gene quantification despite its simplicity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.