Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26559510›Full record

ArticleBMC genomics2015

Tissue-specific transcriptomics and proteomics of a filarial nematode and its Wolbachia endosymbiont.

Ashley N Luck, Kathryn G Anderson, Colleen M McClung, Nathan C VerBerkmoes, Jeremy M Foster, Michelle L Michalski, Barton E Slatko

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 47 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. A Meta-Analysis ofG3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2020
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Heartworm disease - Overview, intervention, and industry perspective.International journal for parasitology. Drugs and drug resistance · 2021
    Review
  10. Immunoproteomic Analysis ofPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
  11. Diminutive, degraded but dissimilar:Microbial genomics · 2020
    Article
  12. Comparative Genomics Guides Elucidation of Vitamin BApplied and environmental microbiology · 2020
    Article
  13. Perusal of parasitic nematode 'omics in the post-genomic era.Molecular and biochemical parasitology · 2017
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Lessons from the genomes and transcriptomes of filarial nematodes.Molecular and biochemical parasitology · 2017
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Heme acquisition in the parasitic filarial nematode Brugia malayi.FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology · 2016
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ashley N LuckGenome Biology Division, New England Biolabs, Inc., 240 County Road, Ipswich, MA, 01938, USA.
Kathryn G AndersonDepartment of Biology and Microbiology, University of Wisconsin Oshkosh, Oshkosh, WI, 54901, USA.
Colleen M McClungChemical Biology Division, New England Biolabs, Inc., 240 County Road, Ipswich, MA, 01938, USA.
Nathan C VerBerkmoesChemical Biology Division, New England Biolabs, Inc., 240 County Road, Ipswich, MA, 01938, USA.
Jeremy M FosterGenome Biology Division, New England Biolabs, Inc., 240 County Road, Ipswich, MA, 01938, USA.
Michelle L MichalskiDepartment of Biology and Microbiology, University of Wisconsin Oshkosh, Oshkosh, WI, 54901, USA.
Barton E SlatkoGenome Biology Division, New England Biolabs, Inc., 240 County Road, Ipswich, MA, 01938, USA. slatko@neb.com.
New England Biolabs (United States) · USUniversity of Wisconsin–Oshkosh · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFilarial nematodes cause debilitating human diseases. While treatable, recent evidence suggests drug resistance is developing, necessitating the development of novel targets and new treatment options. Although transcriptomic and proteomic studies around the nematode life cycle have greatly enhanced our knowledge, whole organism approaches have not provided spatial resolution of gene expression, which can be gained by examining individual tissues. Generally, due to their small size, tissue dissection of human-infecting filarial nematodes remains extremely challenging. However, canine heartworm disease is caused by a closely related and much larger filarial nematode, Dirofilaria immitis. As with many other filarial nematodes, D. immitis contains Wolbachia, an obligate bacterial endosymbiont present in the hypodermis and developing oocytes within the uterus. Here, we describe the first concurrent tissue-specific transcriptomic and proteomic profiling of a filarial nematode (D. immitis) and its Wolbachia (wDi) in order to better understand tissue functions and identify tissue-specific antigens that may be used for the development of new diagnostic and therapeutic tools.

methodsAdult D. immitis worms were dissected into female body wall (FBW), female uterus (FU), female intestine (FI), female head (FH), male body wall (MBW), male testis (MT), male intestine (MI), male head (MH) and 10.1186/s12864-015-2083-2 male spicule (MS) and used to prepare transcriptomic and proteomic libraries.

resultsTranscriptomic and proteomic analysis of several D. immitis tissues identified many biological functions enriched within certain tissues. Hierarchical clustering of the D. immitis tissue transcriptomes, along with the recently published whole-worm adult male and female D. immitis transcriptomes, revealed that the whole-worm transcriptome is typically dominated by transcripts originating from reproductive tissue. The uterus appeared to have the most variable transcriptome, possibly due to age. Although many functions are shared between the reproductive tissues, the most significant differences in gene expression were observed between the uterus and testis. Interestingly, wDi gene expression in the male and female body wall is fairly similar, yet slightly different to that of Wolbachia gene expression in the uterus. Proteomic methods verified 32 % of the predicted D. immitis proteome, including over 700 hypothetical proteins of D. immitis. Of note, hypothetical proteins were among some of the most abundant Wolbachia proteins identified, which may fulfill some important yet still uncharacterized biological function.

conclusionsThe spatial resolution gained from this parallel transcriptomic and proteomic analysis adds to our understanding of filarial biology and serves as a resource with which to develop future therapeutic strategies against filarial nematodes and their Wolbachia endosymbionts.

Indexed as

ProteomeSymbiosisTranscriptomeAnimalsCluster AnalysisComputational BiologyDirofilaria immitisFemaleGene Expression ProfilingMaleOrgan SpecificityProteomicsWolbachiaProteome

Identifiers

PMID26559510
PMCPMC4642636
OpenAlexW2180284072

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.