Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26559508›Full record

ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2016

Annotation of rule-based models with formal semantics to enable creation, analysis, reuse and visualization.

Goksel Misirli, Matteo Cavaliere, William Waites, Matthew Pocock, Curtis Madsen, Owen Gilfellon, Ricardo Honorato-Zimmer, Paolo Zuliani, Vincent Danos, Anil Wipat

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. BioNetGen 2.2: advances in rule-based modeling.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2016
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Goksel MisirliInterdisciplinary Computing and Complex BioSystems Research Group, School of Computing Science and Centre for Synthetic Biology and the Bioeconomy, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Matteo CavaliereSchool of Informatics, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK and.
William WaitesSchool of Informatics, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK and.
Matthew PocockTuring Ate My Hamster Ltd., Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Curtis MadsenInterdisciplinary Computing and Complex BioSystems Research Group, School of Computing Science and Centre for Synthetic Biology and the Bioeconomy, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Owen GilfellonInterdisciplinary Computing and Complex BioSystems Research Group, School of Computing Science and Centre for Synthetic Biology and the Bioeconomy, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Ricardo Honorato-ZimmerSchool of Informatics, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK and.
Paolo ZulianiInterdisciplinary Computing and Complex BioSystems Research Group, School of Computing Science and Centre for Synthetic Biology and the Bioeconomy, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Vincent DanosSchool of Informatics, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK and.
Anil WipatInterdisciplinary Computing and Complex BioSystems Research Group, School of Computing Science and Centre for Synthetic Biology and the Bioeconomy, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

motivationBiological systems are complex and challenging to model and therefore model reuse is highly desirable. To promote model reuse, models should include both information about the specifics of simulations and the underlying biology in the form of metadata. The availability of computationally tractable metadata is especially important for the effective automated interpretation and processing of models. Metadata are typically represented as machine-readable annotations which enhance programmatic access to information about models. Rule-based languages have emerged as a modelling framework to represent the complexity of biological systems. Annotation approaches have been widely used for reaction-based formalisms such as SBML. However, rule-based languages still lack a rich annotation framework to add semantic information, such as machine-readable descriptions, to the components of a model.

resultsWe present an annotation framework and guidelines for annotating rule-based models, encoded in the commonly used Kappa and BioNetGen languages. We adapt widely adopted annotation approaches to rule-based models. We initially propose a syntax to store machine-readable annotations and describe a mapping between rule-based modelling entities, such as agents and rules, and their annotations. We then describe an ontology to both annotate these models and capture the information contained therein, and demonstrate annotating these models using examples. Finally, we present a proof of concept tool for extracting annotations from a model that can be queried and analyzed in a uniform way. The uniform representation of the annotations can be used to facilitate the creation, analysis, reuse and visualization of rule-based models. Although examples are given, using specific implementations the proposed techniques can be applied to rule-based models in general. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: The annotation ontology for rule-based models can be found at http://purl.org/rbm/rbmo The krdf tool and associated executable examples are available at http://purl.org/rbm/rbmo/krdf CONTACT: anil.wipat@newcastle.ac.uk or vdanos@inf.ed.ac.uk.

Indexed as

SemanticsModels, Theoretical

Identifiers

PMID26559508
PMCPMC4803388

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.