Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26559455›Full record

ArticleMedicine and science in sports and exercise2016

Effects of Pedal Speed and Crank Length on Pedaling Mechanics during Submaximal Cycling.

Paul Richard Barratt, James C Martin, Steve J Elmer, Thomas Korff

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medicine and science in sports and exercise, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Paul Richard Barratt1Division of Sport, Health, and Exercise Sciences, Brunel University, Uxbridge, UNITED KINGDOM; 2Department of Biomechanics, English Institute of Sport, Manchester, UNITED KINGDOM; 3Departent of Exercise and Sport Science, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT; 4Department of Kinesiology and Integrative Physiology, Michigan Technological University, Houghton, MI.
James C Martin
Steve J Elmer
Thomas Korff
Brunel University of London · GBCreative Commons · USUniversity of Utah · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

unlabelledDuring submaximal cycling, the neuromuscular system has the freedom to select different intermuscular coordination strategies. From both a basic science and an applied perspective, it is important to understand how the central nervous system adjusts pedaling mechanics in response to changes in pedaling conditions. PURPOSE: To determine the effect of changes in pedal speed (a marker of muscle shortening velocity) and crank length (a marker of muscle length) on pedaling mechanics during submaximal cycling.

methodsFifteen trained cyclists performed submaximal isokinetic cycling trials (90 rpm, 240 W) using pedal speeds of 1.41 to 1.61 m·s(-1) and crank lengths of 150 to 190 mm. Joint powers were calculated using inverse dynamics.

resultsIncreases in pedal speed and crank length caused large increases knee and hip angular excursions and velocities (P < 0.05), whereas ankle angular kinematics stayed relatively constant (P > 0.05). Joint moments and joint powers were less affected by changes in the independent variables, but some interesting effects and trends were observed. Most noteworthy, knee extension moments and powers tended to decrease, whereas hip extension power tended to increase with an increase in crank length.

conclusionsThe distribution of joint moments and powers is largely maintained across a range of pedaling conditions. The crank length induced differences in knee extension moments, and powers may represent a trade-off between the central nervous system's attempts to simultaneously minimize muscle metabolic and mechanical stresses. These results increase our understanding of the neural and mechanical mechanisms underlying multi-joint task performance, and they have practical relevance to coaches, athletes, and clinicians.

Indexed as

AdultAnkle JointAthletesBicyclingBiomechanical PhenomenaExercise TestFemaleHip JointHumansKnee JointMaleRange of Motion, ArticularTask Performance and AnalysisYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID26559455
PMCPMC5638423
OpenAlexW2288226814

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.