Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26559280›Full record

Observational studyMedicine2015

Dementia Risk in Irradiated Patients With Head and Neck Cancer.

Jin-Hua Chen, Yu-Chun Yen, Shing-Hwa Liu, Fei-Peng Lee, Kuan-Chou Lin, Ming-Tang Lai, Chia-Che Wu, Tsung-Ming Chen, Sheng-Po Yuan, Chia-Lun Chang and 1 more

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Medicine, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Jin-Hua ChenFrom the Biostatistics Center and School of Public Health, Taipei Medical University (J-HC, Y-CY); Institute of Toxicology, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University (S-HL, S-YW); Department of Otorhinolaryngology (F-PL, M-TL, C-CW, T-MC, S-PY); Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery (K-CL); Department of Hemato-Oncology (C-LC); Department of Radiation Oncology, Wan Fang Hospital, Taipei Medical University (S-YW); Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei (S-YW); and Department of Biotechnology, Hungkuang University, Taichung, Taiwan, Republic of China (S-YW).
Yu-Chun Yen
Shing-Hwa Liu
Fei-Peng Lee
Kuan-Chou Lin
Ming-Tang Lai
Chia-Che Wu
Tsung-Ming Chen
Sheng-Po Yuan
Chia-Lun Chang
Szu-Yuan Wu

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Patients with head and neck cancer are treated through surgery, radiotherapy (RT), and chemotherapy (CT). Carotid artery damage and neurotoxicity were previously observed in these patients. This study estimated the dementia risk associated with different treatment modalities in a head and neck cancer population with long-term follow-up. Taiwan's National Health Insurance claims database and a cancer registry database from the Collaboration Center of Health Information Application were linked for the present analysis. Patients with head and neck cancer, treated from January 1, 2002 to December 31, 2010, were included in the study. The follow-up duration was the period from the index date to December 31, 2012. Inclusion criteria were head and neck cancer; an age >20 years; and having undergone surgery, CT, concurrent CT, or surgery with adjuvant treatment. Exclusion criteria were another cancer diagnosed before the head and neck cancer, death or being diagnosed with dementia within 2 years after the treatment of the head and neck cancer, stroke before the index date, distant metastasis, in situ carcinoma, sarcoma, head and neck cancer recurrence, an unknown sex, and an age <20 years. In total, 20,135 patients were included. In patient groups that underwent surgery alone, surgery and adjuvant chemoradiotherapy, and chemoradiotherapy alone, the dementia incidence per 1000 person-years was 1.44, 1.04, and 1.98, respectively. The crude hazard ratio (HR) of dementia was 1.84 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.21-2.81) in the RT with or without CT group. After adjustment for age, sex, clinical stage, and comorbidity, the HR was 1.92 (95% CI 1.14-3.24). Examining the dementia risk in patients who received different treatment modalities according to the Cox proportional-hazard model revealed that an age >65 years and having undergone RT with or without CT were risk factors (P < 0.001 and P = 0.015; and HRs of 16.5 and 1.92, respectively). The dementia risk in patients at different clinical stages was not significantly different among the various treatment groups, regardless of whether the patients received RT. However, younger (<65 y) patients who received RT with or without CT had a 2.96-fold (95% CI 1.24-7.08) higher risk of dementia and a 3.54-fold (95% CI 1.32-9.51) higher adjusted HR compared with the surgery-alone group. Patients who received a total radiation dose >6660 cGy exhibited a 1.69-fold (95% CI 0.97-2.95, P = 0.063) higher dementia risk compared with those who received a total radiation dose <6660 cGy. Receiving a higher radiation dose increased the dementia risk and persistently escalated the dementia incidence even 9 years after RT. Younger (<65 y) patients have a high risk of dementia after RT. The selection of young patients for dose de-escalation requires improvement for reducing irradiation to the neck and areas near brain tissues, particularly in Taiwan, where the median patient age is 53 years.

Indexed as

AgedAge FactorsCranial IrradiationDementiaFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHead and Neck NeoplasmsHumansIncidenceMaleMiddle AgedTaiwan

Identifiers

PMID26559280
PMCPMC4912274

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.