Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26559241›Full record

Trial reportBMJ (Clinical research ed.)2015

Computerised cognitive behaviour therapy (cCBT) as treatment for depression in primary care (REEACT trial): large scale pragmatic randomised controlled trial.

Simon Gilbody, Elizabeth Littlewood, Catherine Hewitt, Gwen Brierley, Puvan Tharmanathan, Ricardo Araya, Michael Barkham, Peter Bower, Cindy Cooper, Linda Gask and 12 more

Erratum issued 3 registry-linked trialsAbstract readComparative StudyMulticenter StudyPragmatic Clinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to 3 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 217 papers, 23 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
217citing papers in PubMed, 23 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03445598 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2018, after this paper: background citation

A Novel and Adaptive Software for Automated Delivery of Cognitive Behavioral Therapy

TypeinterventionalSponsorIndian Institute of Technology KanpurRan2018 to 2019Enrolled600ConditionsDepressive SymptomsArmsInteractive and personalized CCBT, Feature-limited CCBT, Waitlist control
NCT04948996 naterminatednot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

Effectiveness of Group Versus Individual Self-management of Depression Using a Mobile App to Increase Treatment Adherence Among Users of a University-based Helpline in the Dominican Republic.

TypeinterventionalSponsorNorthern Illinois UniversityRan2021 to 2021Enrolled27ConditionsDepression Mild, Depression ModerateArmsEl Buen Consejo Móvil- Group (EBCM-G), El Buen Consejo Móvil- Individual (EBCM-I)
NCT05746767 naenrolling by invitationnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

SUPERA: Supporting Peer Interactions to Expand Access to Digital Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Spanish-speaking Safety-Net Patients in Primary Care

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of California, IrvineRan2024 to 2028Enrolled426ConditionsDepression, AnxietyArmsSupported dCBT, Unsupported dCBT
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

217 citing papers in PubMed, 23 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Pooled it
  11. Pooled it
  12. Pooled it
  13. Pooled it
  14. Pooled it
  15. Pooled it
  16. Pooled it
  17. Pooled it
  18. Pooled it
  19. Pooled it
  20. Pooled it

157 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors.

Simon GilbodyDepartment of Health Sciences, University of York, York YO10 5DD, UK simon.gilbody@york.ac.uk.
Elizabeth LittlewoodDepartment of Health Sciences, University of York, York YO10 5DD, UK.
Catherine HewittYork Trials Unit, Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York YO10 5DD, UK.
Gwen BrierleyMRC Epidemiology Unit, University of Cambridge School of Clinical Medicine, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, UK.
Puvan TharmanathanYork Trials Unit, Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York YO10 5DD, UK.
Ricardo ArayaDepartment of Population Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London WC1E 7HT, UK.
Michael BarkhamCentre for Psychological Services Research, Department of Psychology, University of Sheffield, Sheffield S10 2TP, UK.
Peter BowerNIHR School for Primary Care Research, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9NT, UK.
Cindy CooperClinical Trials Research Unit, School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield S1 4DA, UK.
Linda GaskNIHR School for Primary Care Research, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9NT, UK.
David KesslerCentre for Academic Primary Care, School of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol BS8 2BN, UK.
Helen LesterPrimary Care Clinical Sciences Building, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK.
Karina LovellSchool of Nursing, Midwifery and Social Work, University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PL, UK.
Glenys ParrySchool of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield S1 4DA, UK.
David A RichardsUniversity of Exeter Medical School, University of Exeter, Exeter EX1 2LU, UK.
Phil AndersenDepartment of Health Sciences, University of York, York YO10 5DD, UK.
Sally BrabynDepartment of Health Sciences, University of York, York YO10 5DD, UK.
Sarah KnowlesNIHR School for Primary Care Research, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9NT, UK.
Charles ShepherdFaculty of Health and Social Care, University of Hull, Hull HU6 7RX, UK.
Debbie TallonCentre for Academic Primary Care, School of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol BS8 2BN, UK.
David WhiteClinical Trials Research Unit, School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield S1 4DA, UK.
REEACT Team

Funding

Department of Health 06/43/05Department of Health HTA/06/43/504
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

study questionHow effective is supported computerised cognitive behaviour therapy (cCBT) as an adjunct to usual primary care for adults with depression?

methodsThis was a pragmatic, multicentre, three arm, parallel randomised controlled trial with simple randomisation. Treatment allocation was not blinded. Participants were adults with symptoms of depression (score ≥ 10 on nine item patient health questionnaire, PHQ-9) who were randomised to receive a commercially produced cCBT programme ("Beating the Blues") or a free to use cCBT programme (MoodGYM) in addition to usual GP care. Participants were supported and encouraged to complete the programme via weekly telephone calls. Control participants were offered usual GP care, with no constraints on the range of treatments that could be accessed. The primary outcome was severity of depression assessed with the PHQ-9 at four months. Secondary outcomes included health related quality of life (measured by SF-36) and psychological wellbeing (measured by CORE-OM) at four, 12, and 24 months and depression at 12 and 24 months. STUDY ANSWER AND LIMITATIONS: Participants offered commercial or free to use cCBT experienced no additional improvement in depression compared with usual GP care at four months (odds ratio 1.19 (95% confidence interval 0.75 to 1.88) for Beating the Blues v usual GP care; 0.98 (0.62 to 1.56) for MoodGYM v usual GP care). There was no evidence of an overall difference between either programme compared with usual GP care (0.99 (0.57 to 1.70) and 0.68 (0.42 to 1.10), respectively) at any time point. Commercially provided cCBT conferred no additional benefit over free to use cCBT or usual GP care at any follow-up point. Uptake and use of cCBT was low, despite regular telephone support. Nearly a quarter of participants (24%) had dropped out by four months. The study did not have enough power to detect small differences so these cannot be ruled out. Findings cannot be generalised to cCBT offered with a much higher level of guidance and support. WHAT THIS STUDY ADDS: Supported cCBT does not substantially improve depression outcomes compared with usual GP care alone. In this study, neither a commercially available nor free to use computerised CBT intervention was superior to usual GP care. FUNDING, COMPETING INTERESTS, DATA SHARING: Commissioned and funded by the UK National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment (HTA) programme (project No 06/43/05). The authors have no competing interests. Requests for patient level data will be considered by the REEACT trial management groupTrial registration Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN91947481.

Indexed as

Primary Health CareAdultCognitive Behavioral TherapyDepressionDirective CounselingHealth StatusHumansQuality of LifeSeverity of Illness IndexTelephoneTherapy, Computer-AssistedTime FactorsTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID26559241
PMCPMC4641883

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.