Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26559010›Full record

ArticleSystematic biology2016

The Phylogeny of Rickettsia Using Different Evolutionary Signatures: How Tree-Like is Bacterial Evolution?

Gemma G R Murray, Lucy A Weinert, Emma L Rhule, John J Welch

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Systematic biology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Infection and immunity · 2025
    Article
  8. Deep sequencing of 16mSystems · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Tick-Borne Rickettsioses in the Iberian Peninsula.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Brown Dog Tick (International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. High Prevalence of Tick-Borne ZoonoticAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2022
    Article
  20. Searching and Finding the Hidden Treasure: A Retrospective Analysis of Rickettsial Disease Among Dutch International Travelers.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Gemma G R MurrayDepartment of Genetics, University of Cambridge, Downing Street, Cambridge CB2 3EH, UK; and ggrm2@cam.ac.uk.
Lucy A WeinertDepartment of Veterinary Medicine, University of Cambridge, Madingley Road, Cambridge CB3 0ES, UK.
Emma L RhuleDepartment of Genetics, University of Cambridge, Downing Street, Cambridge CB2 3EH, UK; and.
John J WelchDepartment of Genetics, University of Cambridge, Downing Street, Cambridge CB2 3EH, UK; and.

Funding

Medical Research CouncilWellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Rickettsia is a genus of intracellular bacteria whose hosts and transmission strategies are both impressively diverse, and this is reflected in a highly dynamic genome. Some previous studies have described the evolutionary history of Rickettsia as non-tree-like, due to incongruity between phylogenetic reconstructions using different portions of the genome. Here, we reconstruct the Rickettsia phylogeny using whole-genome data, including two new genomes from previously unsampled host groups. We find that a single topology, which is supported by multiple sources of phylogenetic signal, well describes the evolutionary history of the core genome. We do observe extensive incongruence between individual gene trees, but analyses of simulations over a single topology and interspersed partitions of sites show that this is more plausibly attributed to systematic error than to horizontal gene transfer. Some conflicting placements also result from phylogenetic analyses of accessory genome content (i.e., gene presence/absence), but we argue that these are also due to systematic error, stemming from convergent genome reduction, which cannot be accommodated by existing phylogenetic methods. Our results show that, even within a single genus, tests for gene exchange based on phylogenetic incongruence may be susceptible to false positives.

Indexed as

PhylogenyBiological EvolutionClassificationComputer SimulationGenome, BacterialRickettsiaGene tree discordancegenome reductionhorizontal gene transferreticulate evolutionsystematic error

Identifiers

PMID26559010
PMCPMC4748751

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.