Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26558906›Full record

ReviewHerzschrittmachertherapie & Elektrophysiologie2015

[Catheter ablation and the complications].

D Steven, J H van den Bruck, T Plenge, J Lüker, A Sultan

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Herzschrittmachertherapie & Elektrophysiologie, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 39% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

D StevenAbteilung für Elektrophysiologie, III Medizinische Klinik, Herzzentrum der Universität zu Köln, Kerpener Str. 62, 50937, Köln, Deutschland. daniel.steven@uk-koeln.de.
J H van den BruckAbteilung für Elektrophysiologie, III Medizinische Klinik, Herzzentrum der Universität zu Köln, Kerpener Str. 62, 50937, Köln, Deutschland.
T PlengeAbteilung für Elektrophysiologie, III Medizinische Klinik, Herzzentrum der Universität zu Köln, Kerpener Str. 62, 50937, Köln, Deutschland.
J LükerAbteilung für Elektrophysiologie, III Medizinische Klinik, Herzzentrum der Universität zu Köln, Kerpener Str. 62, 50937, Köln, Deutschland.
A SultanAbteilung für Elektrophysiologie, III Medizinische Klinik, Herzzentrum der Universität zu Köln, Kerpener Str. 62, 50937, Köln, Deutschland.
University of Cologne · DECentrum für Integrierte Onkologie · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation has developed into a standard therapy and even in some cases as a first line therapy. This has resulted in a clear increase in the number of procedures in recent years. The published data from experienced centers indicate that the number of complications decreases with increasing experience; however, due to the parallel increase in the number of inexperienced centers, the average complication rate shows a tendency to increase. In the long term this necessitates a reliable quality assurance in order not to leave the choice of the "safe centers" up to the patient. Vascular complications are the most common, which in most cases have an uneventful course and do not necessitate further interventions. Particularly the incidence of ischemic stroke can be well-countered by strict control of periprocedural anticoagulation. The frequency of occurrence of phrenic nerve lesions, which are more common when selecting cryoenergy, can be reduced by stimulation of the phrenic nerve during ablation of the right pulmonary vein. The most feared complication of an atrioesophageal fistula is rare. No data for an effective avoidance of complications are available. A postprocedural therapy with proton pump inhibitors for 4-6 weeks, the intraprocedural measurement of esophageal temperature and reduction of the ablation energy on the posterior wall of the left atrium can possible help to reduce the frequency of complications.

Indexed as

Atrial FibrillationCardiovascular Surgical ProceduresCatheter AblationEsophageal FistulaEvidence-Based MedicineHumansPeripheral Nerve InjuriesStrokeTreatment OutcomeVascular DiseasesArrhythmias, cardiacAtrial fibrillationComplications, vascularPhrenic nerve lesionStroke, ischemic

Identifiers

PMID26558906
OpenAlexW2162986826

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.