ArticlePloS one2015
Efficient In Silico Identification of a Common Insertion in the MAK Gene which Causes Retinitis Pigmentosa.
Article in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- Natural history of retinitis pigmentosa based on genotype, vitamin A/E supplementation, and an electroretinogram biomarker.JCI insight · 2023Trial
- In Silico identification of a common mobile element insertion in exon 4 of RP1.Scientific reports · 2021Trial
- Screening of Inherited Retinal Disease Patients in a Low-Resource Setting Using an Augmented Next-Generation Sequencing Panel.Molecular genetics & genomic medicine · 2024Article
- Long-read sequencing improves the genetic diagnosis of retinitis pigmentosa by identifying an Alu retrotransposon insertion in the EYS gene.Mobile DNA · 2024Article
- Combining globally search for a regular expression and print matching lines with bibliographic monitoring of genomic database improves diagnosis.Frontiers in genetics · 2023Article
- Mutations in SCNM1 cause orofaciodigital syndrome due to minor intron splicing defects affecting primary cilia.American journal of human genetics · 2022Article
- The importance of automation in genetic diagnosis: Lessons from analyzing an inherited retinal degeneration cohort with the Mendelian Analysis Toolkit (MATK).Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics · 2022Article
- Accurate Detection and Quantification of FLT3 Internal Tandem Duplications in Clinical Hybrid Capture Next-Generation Sequencing Data.The Journal of molecular diagnostics : JMD · 2021Article
- Copy-number variation contributes 9% of pathogenicity in the inherited retinal degenerations.Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics · 2020Article
- Characterizing variants of unknown significance in rhodopsin: A functional genomics approach.Human mutation · 2019Article
- Retrotransposon insertion as a novel mutational event in Bardet-Biedl syndrome.Molecular genetics & genomic medicine · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundNext generation sequencing (NGS) offers a rapid and comprehensive method of screening for mutations associated with retinitis pigmentosa and related disorders. However, certain sequence alterations such as large insertions or deletions may remain undetected using standard NGS pipelines. One such mutation is a recently-identified Alu insertion into the Male Germ Cell-Associated Kinase (MAK) gene, which is missed by standard NGS-based variant callers. Here, we developed an in silico method of searching NGS raw sequence reads to detect this mutation, without the need to recalculate sequence alignments or to screen every sample by PCR.
methodsThe Linux program grep was used to search for a 23 bp "probe" sequence containing the known junction sequence of the insert. A corresponding search was performed with the wildtype sequence. The matching reads were counted and further compared to the known sequences of the full wildtype and mutant genomic loci. (See https://github.com/MEEIBioinformaticsCenter/grepsearch.).
resultsIn a test sample set consisting of eleven previously published homozygous mutants, detection of the MAK-Alu insertion was validated with 100% sensitivity and specificity. As a discovery cohort, raw NGS reads from 1,847 samples (including custom and whole exome selective capture) were searched in ~1 hour on a local computer cluster, yielding an additional five samples with MAK-Alu insertions and solving two previously unsolved pedigrees. Of these, one patient was homozygous for the insertion, one compound heterozygous with a missense change on the other allele (c. 46G>A; p.Gly16Arg), and three were heterozygous carriers.
conclusionsUsing the MAK-Alu grep program proved to be a rapid and effective method of finding a known, disease-causing Alu insertion in a large cohort of patients with NGS data. This simple approach avoids wet-lab assays or computationally expensive algorithms, and could also be used for other known disease-causing insertions and deletions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.