Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26558386›Full record

Trial reportBMC pediatrics2015

Synergistic effect of combined transcranial direct current stimulation/constraint-induced movement therapy in children and young adults with hemiparesis: study protocol.

Bernadette Gillick, Jeremiah Menk, Bryon Mueller, Gregg Meekins, Linda E Krach, Timothy Feyma, Kyle Rudser

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC pediatrics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02250092 (Synergistic Effect of Combined Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation/Constraint Induced Movement Therapy in Children With Hemiparesis), which is not on this map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02250092 nacompletednot on this map

Synergistic Effect of Combined Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation/Constraint Induced Movement Therapy in Children With Hemiparesis

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of MinnesotaRan2014 to 2017Enrolled20ConditionsPediatric HemiparesisArmsTranscranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS), Placebo Comparator
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Safety and feasibility of transcranial direct current stimulation stratified by corticospinal organization in children with hemiparesis.European journal of paediatric neurology : EJPN : official journal of the European Paediatric Neurology Society · 2023
    Trial
  2. Transcranial direct current stimulation and constraint-induced therapy in cerebral palsy: A randomized, blinded, sham-controlled clinical trial.European journal of paediatric neurology : EJPN : official journal of the European Paediatric Neurology Society · 2018
    Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Transcranial direct current stimulation in children and adolescents: a comprehensive review.Journal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996) · 2016
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Bernadette GillickUniversity of Minnesota, 420 Delaware Street SE, MMC 388, Minneapolis, MN, 55455, USA. gillick@umn.edu.
Jeremiah MenkBiostatistical Design and Analysis Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, 55455, USA. menk0023@umn.edu.
Bryon MuellerDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, 55455, USA. muell093@umn.edu.
Gregg MeekinsDepartment of Neurology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA. gmeekins@umn.edu.
Linda E KrachCourage Kenny Rehabilitation Institute, part of Allina Health, 800 East 28th Street, Minneapolis, MN, 55407, USA. linda.krach@allina.com.
Timothy FeymaDepartment of Neurology, Gillette Children's Specialty Healthcare, 200 University Ave E, Saint Paul, MN, 55101, USA. TFeyma@gillettechildrens.com.
Kyle RudserDivision of Biostatistics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA. rudser@umn.edu.
University of Minnesota · USAllina Health · USGillette Children's Specialty Healthcare · US

Funding

University of Minnesota Clinical and Translational Science Institute (UMN CTSI)UL1TR000114 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI BLAZAR, BRUCE R · 2012 to 2015
$35.0M
NMR Imaging and SpectroscopyP41EB015894 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI UGURBIL, KAMIL · 2012 to 2017
$8.4M
University of Minnesota Clinical and Translational Science Institute (UMN CTSI)KL2TR000113 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI BLAZAR, BRUCE R · 2012 to 2015
$5.4M
Novel Neuromodulatory Intervention in the Rehabilitation of Pediatric HemiparesisK01HD078484 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI GILLICK, BERNADETTE THERESE · 2014 to 2018
$654k
NCATS NIH HHS KL2 TR000113NCATS NIH HHS KL2TR000113NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000114NCATS NIH HHS UL1TR000114NIBIB NIH HHS P41 EB015894NICHD NIH HHS #HD078484-01A1NICHD NIH HHS K01 HD078484
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPerinatal stroke occurs in more than 1 in 2,500 live births and resultant congenital hemiparesis necessitates investigation into interventions which may improve long-term function and decreased burden of care beyond current therapies ( http://www.cdc.gov/ncbddd/cp/data.html ). Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy (CIMT) is recognized as an effective hemiparesis rehabilitation intervention. Transcranial direct current stimulation as an adjunct treatment to CIMT may potentiate neuroplastic responses and improve motor function. The methodology of a clinical trial in children designed as a placebo-controlled, serial -session, non-invasive brain stimulation trial incorporating CIMT is described here. The primary hypotheses are 1) that no serious adverse events will occur in children receiving non-invasive brain stimulation and 2) that children in the stimulation intervention group will show significant improvements in hand motor function compared to children in the placebo stimulation control group. METHODS/

designA randomized, controlled, double-blinded clinical trial. Twenty children and/or young adults (ages 8-21) with congenital hemiparesis, will be enrolled. The intervention group will receive ten 2-hour sessions of transcranial direct current stimulation combined with constraint-induced movement therapy and the control group will receive sham stimulation with CIMT. The primary outcome measure is safety assessment of transcranial direct current stimulation by physician evaluation, vital sign monitoring and symptom reports. Additionally, hand function will be evaluated using the Assisting Hand Assessment, grip strength and assessment of goals using the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure. Neuroimaging will confirm diagnoses, corticospinal tract integrity and cortical activation. Motor cortical excitability will also be examined using transcranial magnetic stimulation techniques. DISCUSSION: Combining non-invasive brain stimulation and CIMT interventions has the potential to improve motor function in children with congenital hemiparesis beyond each intervention independently. Such a combined intervention has the potential to benefit an individual throughout their lifetime.

trial registrationClinicaltrials.gov, NCT02250092 Registered 18 September 2014.

Indexed as

AdolescentChildDouble-Blind MethodExercise TherapyFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHandHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMotor ActivityParesisTranscranial Direct Current StimulationTreatment OutcomeYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID26558386
PMCPMC4642615
OpenAlexW2175555312

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.