Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26558366›Full record

ArticlePloS one2015

A Multiplex Real-Time PCR Assay to Diagnose and Separate Helicoverpa armigera and H. zea (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) in the New World.

Todd M Gilligan, Luke R Tembrock, Roxanne E Farris, Norman B Barr, Marja J van der Straten, Bart T L H van de Vossenberg, Eveline Metz-Verschure

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Pest categorisation ofEFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2020
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Todd M GilliganUSDA-APHIS-PPQ-Science & Technology, Identification Technology Program, Fort Collins, Colorado, United States of America.
Luke R TembrockDepartment of Biology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado, United States of America.
Roxanne E FarrisUSDA-APHIS-PPQ-Science & Technology, Mission Laboratory, Edinburg, Texas, United States of America.
Norman B BarrUSDA-APHIS-PPQ-Science & Technology, Mission Laboratory, Edinburg, Texas, United States of America.
Marja J van der StratenNational Plant Protection Organization, Netherlands Food and Consumers Product Safety Authority, Ministry of Economic Affairs, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Bart T L H van de VossenbergNational Plant Protection Organization, Netherlands Food and Consumers Product Safety Authority, Ministry of Economic Affairs, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Eveline Metz-VerschureNational Plant Protection Organization, Netherlands Food and Consumers Product Safety Authority, Ministry of Economic Affairs, Wageningen, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Old World bollworm, Helicoverpa armigera (Hübner), and the corn earworm, H. zea (Boddie), are two of the most important agricultural pests in the world. Diagnosing these two species is difficult-adults can only be separated with a complex dissection, and larvae cannot be identified to species using morphology, necessitating the use of geographic origin for identification in most instances. With the discovery of H. armigera in the New World, identification of immature Helicoverpa based on origin is no longer possible because H. zea also occurs in all of the geographic regions where H. armigera has been discovered. DNA barcoding and restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) analyses have been reported in publications to distinguish these species, but these methods both require post-PCR processing (i.e., DNA sequencing or restriction digestion) to complete. We report the first real-time PCR assay to distinguish these pests based on two hydrolysis probes that bind to a segment of the internal transcribed spacer region 2 (ITS2) amplified using a single primer pair. One probe targets H. armigera, the second probe targets H. zea, and a third probe that targets a conserved segment of 18S rDNA is used as a control of DNA quality. The assay can be completed in 50 minutes when using isolated DNA and is successfully tested on larvae intercepted at ports of entry and adults captured during domestic surveys. We demonstrate that the assay can be run in triplex with no negative effects on sensitivity, can be run using alternative real-time PCR reagents and instruments, and does not cross react with other New World Heliothinae.

Indexed as

AnimalsBase SequenceCrops, AgriculturalDNADNA PrimersGlycine maxLarvaMolecular Sequence DataMothsReal-Time Polymerase Chain ReactionRNA, Ribosomal, 18SSequence AlignmentSequence Analysis, DNADNADNA PrimersRNA, Ribosomal, 18S

Identifiers

PMID26558366
PMCPMC4641610

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.