Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26558273›Full record

SynthesisBioMed research international2015

The Impact of Pain Assessment on Critically Ill Patients' Outcomes: A Systematic Review.

Evanthia Georgiou, Maria Hadjibalassi, Ekaterini Lambrinou, Panayiota Andreou, Elizabeth D E Papathanassoglou

Open access · hybridAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BioMed research international, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
5.6field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 111 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. The Critical Care Pain Observation Tool for Families (CPOT-Fam).Canadian journal of pain = Revue canadienne de la douleur · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Diurnal Pain Classification in Critically Ill Patients using Machine Learning on Accelerometry and Analgesic Data.IEEE International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedicine workshops. IEEE International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedicine · 2023
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Pain assessment and analgesic management in patients admitted to intensive care: an Australian and New Zealand point prevalence study.Critical care and resuscitation : journal of the Australasian Academy of Critical Care Medicine · 2022
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Pain Control and Opioid Use in ICU should be a Quality Parameter.Indian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Evanthia GeorgiouEducation Sector, Nursing Services, Ministry of Health, 1 Prodromou & Chilonos Street 17, 1448 Nicosia, Cyprus.
Maria HadjibalassiCyprus University of Technology Department of Nursing, 15 Vragadinou Street, 3041 Limassol, Cyprus.
Ekaterini LambrinouCyprus University of Technology Department of Nursing, 15 Vragadinou Street, 3041 Limassol, Cyprus.
Panayiota AndreouCyprus University of Technology Department of Nursing, 15 Vragadinou Street, 3041 Limassol, Cyprus.
Elizabeth D E PapathanassoglouCyprus University of Technology Department of Nursing, 15 Vragadinou Street, 3041 Limassol, Cyprus.
Cyprus University of Technology · CYMinistry of Health · CY

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In critically ill patients, pain is a major problem. Efficient pain management depends on a systematic, comprehensive assessment of pain. We aimed to review and synthesize current evidence on the impact of a systematic approach to pain assessment on critically ill patients' outcomes. A systematic review of published studies (CINAHL, PUBMED, SCOPUS, EMBASE, and COCHRANE databases) with predetermined eligibility criteria was undertaken. Methodological quality was assessed by the EPHPP quality assessment tool. A total of 10 eligible studies were identified. Due to big heterogeneity, quantitative synthesis was not feasible. Most studies indicated the frequency, duration of pain assessment, and types of pain assessment tools. Methodological quality assessment yielded "strong" ratings for 5/10 and "weak" ratings for 3/10 studies. Implementation of systematic approaches to pain assessment appears to associate with more frequent documented reports of pain and more efficient decisions for pain management. There was evidence of favorable effects on pain intensity, duration of mechanical ventilation, length of ICU stay, mortality, adverse events, and complications. This systematic review demonstrates a link between systematic pain assessment and outcome in critical illness. However, the current level of evidence is insufficient to draw firm conclusions. More high quality randomized clinical studies are needed.

Indexed as

Critical IllnessHumansIntensive Care UnitsLength of StayPain MeasurementRespiration, Artificial

Identifiers

PMID26558273
PMCPMC4628961
OpenAlexW1751593560

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.