Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26558090›Full record

ReviewArab journal of urology2013

Penile vascular surgery for treating erectile dysfunction: Current role and future direction.

Eugen Molodysky, Shi-Ping Liu, Sheng-Jean Huang, Geng-Long Hsu

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Arab journal of urology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Cardiometabolic Disorder and Erectile Dysfunction.Cell biochemistry and biophysics · 2024
    Review
  3. Tissue Engineering for Penile Reconstruction.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Penile implants: a look into the future.Translational andrology and urology · 2017
    Review
  7. A history of penile implants.Translational andrology and urology · 2017
    Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Eugen MolodyskyDiscipline of General Practice, Sydney Medical School, University of Sydney, Australia.
Shi-Ping LiuDepartment of Urology, National Taiwan University Hospital, College of Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan.
Sheng-Jean HuangNational Taiwan University Hospital, Jin-Shan Branch, New Taipei, Taiwan.
Geng-Long HsuDepartment of Urology, National Taiwan University Hospital, College of Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan ; National Taiwan University Hospital, Jin-Shan Branch, New Taipei, Taiwan ; Microsurgical Potency Reconstruction and Research Center, Hsu's Andrology, Taipei, Taiwan.
National Taiwan University Hospital · TWUniversity of Sydney · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Penile vascular surgery for treating erectile dysfunction (ED) is still regarded cautiously. Thus we reviewed relevant publications from the last decade, summarising evidence-based reports consistent with the pessimistic consensus and, by contrast, the optimistically viable options for vascular reconstruction for ED published after 2003. Recent studies support a revised model of the tunica albuginea of the corpora cavernosa as a bi-layered structure with a 360° complete inner circular layer and a 300° incomplete outer longitudinal coat. Additional studies show a more sophisticated venous drainage system than previously understood, and most significantly, that the emissary veins can be easily occluded by the shearing action elicited by the inner and outer layers of the tunica albuginea. Pascal's law has been shown to be a significant, if not the major, factor in erectile mechanics, with recent haemodynamic studies on fresh and defrosted human cadavers showing rigid erections despite the lack of endothelial activity. Reports on revascularisation surgery support its utility in treating arterial trauma in young males, and with localised arterial occlusive disease in the older man. Penile venous stripping surgery has been shown to be beneficial in correcting veno-occlusive dysfunction, with outstanding results. The traditional complications of irreversible penile numbness and deformity have been virtually eliminated, with the venous ligation technique superseding venous cautery. Penile vascular reconstructive surgery is viable if, and only if, the surgical handling is appropriate using a sound method. It should be a promising option in the near future.

Indexed as

Arterial reconstructionCC, corpora cavernosaCV, cavernous veinDDV, deep dorsal veinDPVL, dorsal penile vein ligationED, erectile dysfunctionErectile dysfunctionERV, erection-related veinIEGA, inferior epigastric arteryPAV, para-arterial veinPCL, penile crural ligationPenile arterial insufficiencyPRS, penile revascularisation surgeryPVS, penile venous strippingVeno-occlusive dysfunctionVenous strippingVOD, veno-occlusive dysfunction

Identifiers

PMID26558090
PMCPMC4442997
OpenAlexW2088217336

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.