Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26558075›Full record

ReviewArab journal of urology2013

Leiomyosarcoma of the urinary bladder: A review and a report of two further cases.

Nader Y Hamadalla, Usama N Rifat, Khalid C Safi, Mustafa Mohammed, Hussam Abu-Farsakh

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Arab journal of urology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Leiomyosarcoma of lower urinary tract: Literature review.Central European journal of urology · 2025
    Review
  2. Leiomyosarcoma of the bladder: A review and a report of four further cases.International journal of surgery case reports · 2023
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Unusual Visceral Sarcomas: Report of 2 Cases with Review of Literature.Journal of clinical and diagnostic research : JCDR · 2016
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Nader Y HamadallaJordan Hospital and Medical Center, Amman, Jordan.
Usama N RifatIsraa Hospital, Amman, Jordan.
Khalid C SafiJordan Hospital and Medical Center, Amman, Jordan.
Mustafa MohammedRoyal Alexandra Hospital, Glasgow, UK.
Hussam Abu-FarsakhFirst Medical Laboratory, Amman, Jordan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo review the published cases of leiomyosarcoma of the urinary bladder and to report two further cases.

methodsThe databases Pubmed and Hinari were searched using the keywords 'bladder', 'leiomyosarcoma' and 'smooth muscle neoplasm'. The 14 articles identified were reviewed, and we present a further two cases.

resultsOf more than 100 cases reported, 77 were reviewed. There is a lack of consensus about the standard treatment, and little is known about the natural history and prognosis of the tumour, due to its very low incidence. These tumours occur in older adults of either sex and are characterised by an aggressive behaviour. There is usually an unfavourable outcome, with the lungs being the most common site of metastasis. The two further cases we report had a different presentation and outcome.

conclusionsBecause of the limited experience with this rare tumour, there are insufficient data to suggest the optimum management strategy and prognosis.

Indexed as

FNCLCC, Fédération Nationale des Centres de Lutte Contre le CancerHPF, high-power fieldsLeiomyosarcomaManagementMSKCC, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer CenterOutcomeUrinary bladder

Identifiers

PMID26558075
PMCPMC4443010

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.