Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26557950›Full record

ReviewWorld journal of hepatology2015

Microwave ablation of hepatocellular carcinoma.

Guido Poggi, Nevio Tosoratti, Benedetta Montagna, Chiara Picchi

Registry-linked trialOpen access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in World journal of hepatology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03483935 (Microwave Therapy for Treatment of Precancerous Actinic Keratoses), which is not on this map. Cited by 55 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
55citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03483935 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2018, after this paper: background citation

Microwave Therapy for Treatment of Precancerous Actinic Keratoses

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of DundeeRan2018 to 2019Enrolled18ConditionsActinic Keratoses, Precancerous Skin LesionArmsMicrowave treatment
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

55 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 120 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Impact of microwave ablation on survival rates and recurrence in hepatic malignant tumors.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Hepatocellular Carcinoma from a Hepatologist's Perspective.Seminars in interventional radiology · 2023
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Guido PoggiGuido Poggi, Benedetta Montagna, Chiara Picchi, Oncology and Hepatology Unit, Institute of Care Città di Pavia, 27100 Pavia, Italy.
Nevio TosorattiGuido Poggi, Benedetta Montagna, Chiara Picchi, Oncology and Hepatology Unit, Institute of Care Città di Pavia, 27100 Pavia, Italy.
Benedetta MontagnaGuido Poggi, Benedetta Montagna, Chiara Picchi, Oncology and Hepatology Unit, Institute of Care Città di Pavia, 27100 Pavia, Italy.
Chiara PicchiGuido Poggi, Benedetta Montagna, Chiara Picchi, Oncology and Hepatology Unit, Institute of Care Città di Pavia, 27100 Pavia, Italy.
University of Pavia · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although surgical resection is still the optimal treatment option for early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in patients with well compensated cirrhosis, thermal ablation techniques provide a valid non-surgical treatment alternative, thanks to their minimal invasiveness, excellent tolerability and safety profile, proven efficacy in local disease control, virtually unlimited repeatability and cost-effectiveness. Different energy sources are currently employed in clinics as physical agents for percutaneous or intra-surgical thermal ablation of HCC nodules. Among them, radiofrequency (RF) currents are the most used, while microwave ablations (MWA) are becoming increasingly popular. Starting from the 90s', RF ablation (RFA) rapidly became the standard of care in ablation, especially in the treatment of small HCC nodules; however, RFA exhibits substantial performance limitations in the treatment of large lesions and/or tumors located near major heat sinks. MWA, first introduced in the Far Eastern clinical practice in the 80s', showing promising results but also severe limitations in the controllability of the emitted field and in the high amount of power employed for the ablation of large tumors, resulting in a poor coagulative performance and a relatively high complication rate, nowadays shows better results both in terms of treatment controllability and of overall coagulative performance, thanks to the improvement of technology. In this review we provide an extensive and detailed overview of the key physical and technical aspects of MWA and of the currently available systems, and we want to discuss the most relevant published data on MWA treatments of HCC nodules in regard to clinical results and to the type and rate of complications, both in absolute terms and in comparison with RFA.

Indexed as

ComplicationsHepatocellular carcinomaLaparoscopic microwave ablationMicrowave ablationPercutaneous microwave ablationThermal ablation

Identifiers

PMID26557950
PMCPMC4635143
OpenAlexW2204081699

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.