Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26557679›Full record

ArticleBioMed research international2015

Prevalence and Risk Factors of Prostate Cancer in Chinese Men with PSA 4-10 ng/mL Who Underwent TRUS-Guided Prostate Biopsy: The Utilization of PAMD Score.

Dong Fang, Da Ren, Chenglin Zhao, Xuesong Li, Wei Yu, Rui Wang, Huihui Wang, Chenguang Xi, Qun He, Xiaoying Wang and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BioMed research international, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society · 2023
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Dong FangDepartment of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, Institute of Urology, Peking University, National Urological Cancer Center, No. 8 Xishiku Street, Xicheng District, Beijing 100034, China.
Da RenDepartment of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, Institute of Urology, Peking University, National Urological Cancer Center, No. 8 Xishiku Street, Xicheng District, Beijing 100034, China.
Chenglin ZhaoDepartment of Radiology, Peking University First Hospital, No. 8 Xishiku Street, Xicheng District, Beijing 100034, China.
Xuesong LiDepartment of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, Institute of Urology, Peking University, National Urological Cancer Center, No. 8 Xishiku Street, Xicheng District, Beijing 100034, China.
Wei YuDepartment of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, Institute of Urology, Peking University, National Urological Cancer Center, No. 8 Xishiku Street, Xicheng District, Beijing 100034, China.
Rui WangDepartment of Radiology, Peking University First Hospital, No. 8 Xishiku Street, Xicheng District, Beijing 100034, China.
Huihui WangDepartment of Radiology, Peking University First Hospital, No. 8 Xishiku Street, Xicheng District, Beijing 100034, China.
Chenguang XiDepartment of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, Institute of Urology, Peking University, National Urological Cancer Center, No. 8 Xishiku Street, Xicheng District, Beijing 100034, China.
Qun HeDepartment of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, Institute of Urology, Peking University, National Urological Cancer Center, No. 8 Xishiku Street, Xicheng District, Beijing 100034, China.
Xiaoying WangDepartment of Radiology, Peking University First Hospital, No. 8 Xishiku Street, Xicheng District, Beijing 100034, China.
Zhongcheng XinDepartment of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, Institute of Urology, Peking University, National Urological Cancer Center, No. 8 Xishiku Street, Xicheng District, Beijing 100034, China.
Liqun ZhouDepartment of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, Institute of Urology, Peking University, National Urological Cancer Center, No. 8 Xishiku Street, Xicheng District, Beijing 100034, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo elucidate the characteristics and risk factors for positive biopsy outcomes in Chinese patients with prostate specific antigen (PSA) 4-10 ng/mL and develop a risk-stratification score model.

methodsThe data of 345 patients who underwent transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy between 2011 and 2013 was retrospectively analyzed. Digital rectal examination (DRE), prostate volume (PV), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and smoking status were also collected. Positive biopsy outcomes were defined as prostate cancer (PCa) and high grade PCa (HGPCa, Gleason Score ≥ 7).

resultsThe median PSA was 7.15 (IQR 5.91-8.45) ng/mL. Overall 138 patients (40.0%) were shown to have PCa, including 100 patients (29.0%) with HGPCa. Smaller PV, elder age, MRI results, and positive DRE were proved to be predictive factors for positive biopsy outcomes in both univariate and multivariate analysis. We developed a "PAMD" score which combined the four factors to categorize patients into three risk groups, and the model performed good predictive sensitivity and specificity.

conclusionThe prevalence of prostate cancer in Chinese patients with PSA 4-10 ng/mL was 40%, including 29% patients with high grade disease. DRE, age, MRI, and PV were predictive factors for positive biopsy outcomes, and the PAMD score model could be utilized for risk-stratification and decision-making.

Indexed as

AgedAsian PeopleBiopsyHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm GradingPrevalenceProstateProstate-Specific AntigenProstatic NeoplasmsRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsSensitivity and SpecificityProstate-Specific Antigen

Identifiers

PMID26557679
PMCPMC4628742

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.