Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26557509›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical and diagnostic research : JCDR2015

Evaluation of CareSens POCT Devices for Glucose Testing in the Routine Hospital Setting.

Kagan Huysal, Yasemin U Budak, Hakan Demirci, Mehmet Ali Önelge

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical and diagnostic research : JCDR, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kagan HuysalFaculty, Department of Clinical Laboratory, Sevket Yilmaz Education and Research Hospital , Bursa, Turkey .
Yasemin U BudakFaculty, Department of Clinical Laboratory, Sevket Yilmaz Education and Research Hospital , Bursa, Turkey .
Hakan DemirciFaculty, Department of Family Practice, Sevket Yilmaz Education and Research Hospital , Bursa, Turkey .
Mehmet Ali ÖnelgeFaculty, Department of Clinical Laboratory, Sevket Yilmaz Education and Research Hospital , Bursa, Turkey .
Bursa Yuksek Ihtisas Egitim Ve Arastirma Hastanesi · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionGlucose meters are used routinely in hospital wards to manage blood glucose levels in patients requiring frequent monitoring of blood glucose.

objectiveOur institution has 50 POC instruments utilized by diverse population of all ages and medical conditions. The primary objective of our study was to investigate whether all these CareSens glucose meters (I-sense Inc, Seoul, South Korea) results in hospitalized patients during routine clinical care jointly satisfy the specified quality specifications, as defined by Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) guideline POCT12-A3. MATERIALS AND

methodsThe records of hospitalized patients who underwent simultaneous measures of glucose levels with both glucose meters and a central laboratory analyser between January and June 2013 were retrospectively analysed. We also performed a prospective evaluation of the accuracy of the CareSens glucose Strip.

resultsGlucose concentrations measured in 840 patients ranged from 1.66 to 31.72 mmol/L The Bland-Altman difference plot between the auto analyser and all the 50 CareSens glucosemeters revealed a mean bias of -2.2%, with analytical biases for the two methods varying from -31.1% to 26.8%. Eighty four percent of the glucose meter's glucose values were within ± 12.5% for values 5.54 mmol/L of the comparative laboratory glucose values and 93% of the results were within 20% of the reference for glucose >4.2 mmol/L and 65% of the results were within 0.8 mmol/L for glucose <4.2 mmol/L.

conclusionCareSens glucose meter readings in hospital settings, especially in hypoglycaemic patients, should be confirmed by central laboratory analysers whenever possible.

Indexed as

AutoanalysisBlood glucoseMethodsQualitycontrol

Identifiers

PMID26557509
PMCPMC4625228
OpenAlexW2436556185

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.