ReviewRMD open2015
Treatment of complex regional pain syndrome type I with bisphosphonates.
Review in RMD open, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pregabalin and Duloxetine in Patients with Non-Nociceptive Pain: A Narrative Review Exploring the Pharmacological Effects of This Combination.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Benign Evolution of Complex Regional Pain Syndrome (CRPS) Type 1 in Patients Treated with Intravenous Neridronate: A Single-Center Real-Life Experience.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Bone Involvement in Patients with Spondyloarthropathies.Calcified tissue international · 2022Review
- Structural insights into the binding of zoledronic acid with RANKLFrontiers in molecular biosciences · 2022Article
- Complex Regional Pain Syndrome: A Comprehensive Qualitative Research Study on Unmet Needs in the "Patient Journey".Journal of pain research · 2021Article
- Complex regional pain syndrome and bone marrow oedema syndrome: family ties potentially closer than expected.BMJ case reports · 2020Article
- Regeneration of Cochlear Synapses by Systemic Administration of a Bisphosphonate.Frontiers in molecular neuroscience · 2020Article
- Bone microstructure is significantly altered in CRPS-affected distal tibiae as detected by HR-pQCT: a retrospective cross-sectional study.Journal of bone and mineral metabolism · 2019Article
- Novel Pharmacological Nonopioid Therapies in Chronic Pain.Current pain and headache reports · 2018Review
- Demystifying Poststroke Pain: From Etiology to Treatment.PM & R : the journal of injury, function, and rehabilitation · 2017Review
- The Pharmacological Management of Complex Regional Pain Syndrome in Pediatric Patients.Paediatric drugs · 2016Article
- New Chronic Pain Treatments in the Outpatient Setting: Review Article.Current pain and headache reports · 2016Review
- Evaluation of bone microstructure in CRPS-affected upper limbs by HR-pQCT.Clinical cases in mineral and bone metabolism : the official journal of the Italian Society of Osteoporosis, Mineral Metabolism, and Skeletal DiseasesArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Complex regional pain syndrome type I (CRPS-I) is a common and disabling disorder affecting a peripheral limb, usually developing after a trauma to an extremity. CRPS-I is characterised by presence of spontaneous pain, allodynia and hyperalgesia, disproportionate to the inciting event and by a variety of autonomic disturbances and trophic abnormalities. The pathophysiology of CRPS-I has not been fully understood. Experimental models have suggested that an initial triggering event may produce the release of proinflammatory neuropeptides and cytokines, generating a sort of neurogenic inflammation. Thereafter, increased microvascular permeability and intramedullary pressure, reduced oxygen extraction and cellular hypoxia maintain and make the disease worse, producing metabolic tissue acidosis. In this context, it is probable that, far from being a key player, the sympathetic nervous system contributes interacting with these mechanisms and producing vasomotor disturbances. Bisphosphonates (BPs) are potent inhibitors of osteoclastic activity widely used for the management of osteoporosis and other metabolic bone diseases. Their primary pharmacological action is the reduction of bone turnover. An enhanced osteoclastic activity has never been clearly demonstrated in CRPS-I. Therefore, it is likely that the positive effects of BPs in this condition are not related to their antiresorptive properties, but to a more complex interaction between these pharmacological agents and the pathophysiological mechanisms underlying CRPS-I. Results of several clinical trials have suggested the potential beneficial effects of BPs in CRPS-I. In five randomised controlled trials, oral and intravenous alendronate and intravenous clodronate, pamidronate and neridronate demonstrated to be effective in reducing pain and improving physical function in patients presenting with CRPS-I, with a good profile of safety and tolerability. Although these trials have a number of limitations, including the small samples enrolled, there is sufficient evidence to support the use of BPs as agents of choice in the management of CRPS-I.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.