Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26557243›Full record

ArticleEuropean clinical respiratory journal2014

Are patients with COPD treated with NIV in accordance with national guidelines? An internal audit.

Ingrid L Titlestad, Fanny Olsen, Hanna M Sandqvist, Melvin M Pourbazargan, Håvard H Fretheim, Annmarie T Lassen, Jørgen Vestbo

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European clinical respiratory journal, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 91% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Ingrid L TitlestadDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, Odense University Hospital, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
Fanny OlsenDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, Odense University Hospital, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
Hanna M SandqvistDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, Odense University Hospital, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
Melvin M PourbazarganDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, Odense University Hospital, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
Håvard H FretheimDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, Odense University Hospital, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
Annmarie T LassenDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Odense University Hospital, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
Jørgen VestboDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, Odense University Hospital, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark ; Respiratory Research Group, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, University Hospital South Manchester NHS Foundation Trust, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
University of Southern Denmark · DKOdense University Hospital · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionNon-invasive ventilation (NIV) as an add-on modality to medical treatment has been recommended in national guidelines for patients acutely admitted with chronic obstructive pulmonary disorder (COPD) exacerbation and hypercapnic respiratory failure. To address concerns regarding whether NIV is used appropriately, we conducted an audit of COPD patients admitted to a university hospital in Denmark. MATERIAL AND

methodsData from medical records were retrieved for two cohorts in 2010: 1) all patients admitted to the Medical Emergency Ward with the diagnosis of COPD, and 2) all patients receiving NIV regardless of their diagnosis at the Respiratory Ward. Demographic data and outcome of treatment were registered.

resultsCohort 1 comprised 804 admissions fulfilling criteria for COPD at evaluation, and of the 804 admissions, NIV was initiated in 151 (18.7%) admissions. In 42 additional cases (5.2%), initial mild respiratory acidosis was registered at admission, fulfilling criteria for NIV treatment; and, in 36 cases, the clinical status was reported as improved or not reported at all; no deaths were observed. In cohort 2, 124 admissions were registered that comprised 110 admissions with COPD and 14 without a diagnosis of COPD (of which half had a 'not-to-intubate' order). The indication for NIV treatment was met in 92.7% of the COPD admissions.

conclusionNIV was initiated in 18.8% of the COPD admissions, and in an additional 5.2%, NIV criteria were met without initiation. In 82.3% of the admissions receiving NIV, a COPD diagnosis and correct criteria for NIV treatment were met.

Indexed as

COPDhypercapneanon-invasive ventilationrespiratory failure

Identifiers

PMID26557243
PMCPMC4629757
OpenAlexW1991331601

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.