ArticleJournal of human kinetics2015
Validation and Reliability of a Novel Test of Upper Body Isometric Strength.
Article in Journal of human kinetics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Evaluation of the effects of two doses of alpha glycerylphosphorylcholine on physical and psychomotor performance.Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition · 2017Trial
- The effect of 6 days of alpha glycerylphosphorylcholine on isometric strength.Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition · 2015Trial
- Agreement-Based Validation of ISOMETRO for Upper-Limb Isometric Tension Measurements.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Strength, Jump Height, Landing, and Mobility Metrics Predict High and Low Performers of a Fire and Move Assessment: A Machine Learning Approach.Medicine and science in sports and exercise · 2025Article
- A Quantitative Analysis of Internal and External Loads in Aviation Firefighting Using a Simulated Scenario.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Upper-body isometric horizontal strength in game sport athletes.Frontiers in sports and active living · 2023Article
- Validity and reliability of upper body push and pull tests to determine one-repetition maximum.PloS one · 2023Article
- Validity and Reliability of Isometric-Bench for Knee Isometric Assessment.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020Article
- The Acute Effects of Different Forms of Suspension Push-Ups on Oxygen Consumption, Salivary Testosterone and Cortisol and Isometric Strength.Journal of human kinetics · 2018Article
- Effects of an Elastic Hamstring Assistance Device During Downhill Running.Journal of human kinetics · 2017Article
- Reliability and Factorial Validity of Non-Specific and Tennis-Specific Pre-Planned Agility Tests; Preliminary Analysis.Journal of human kinetics · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The purpose of the present investigation was to examine the association of a novel test of upper body isometric strength against a 1RM bench press measurement. Forty college age adults (n = 20 female, n = 20 male; age 22.8 ± 2.8 years; body height 171.6 ± 10.8 cm; body mass 73.5 ± 16.3 kg; body fat 23.1 ± 5.4%) volunteered for the present investigation. The participants reported to the lab on three occasions. The first visit included anthropometric measurements and familiarization with both the upper body isometric test and bench press exercise. The final visits were conducted in a randomized order, with one being a 1RM assessment on the bench press and the other consisting of three trials of the upper body isometric assessment. For the isometric test, participants were positioned in a "push-up" style position while tethered (stainless steel chain) to a load cell (high frequency) anchored to the ground. The peak isometric force was consistent across all three trials (ICC = 0.98) suggesting good reliability. Multiple regression analysis was completed with the predictors: peak isometric force, gender, against the outcome variable 1RM bench press. The analysis resulted in a significant model (r2 = 0.861, p≤0.001) with all predictor variables attaining significance in the model (p<0.05). Isometric peak strength had the greatest effect on the model (Beta = 5.19, p≤0.001). Results from this study suggest that the described isometric upper body strength assessment is likely a valid and reliable tool to determine strength. Further research is warranted to gather a larger pool of data in regard to this assessment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.