ReviewWorld journal of gastroenterology2015
Preoperative endoscopic diagnosis of superficial non-ampullary duodenal epithelial tumors, including magnifying endoscopy.
Review in World journal of gastroenterology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
27 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 56 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comparison of endoscopic ultrasonography and magnifying endoscopy for assessment of the invasion depth of shallow gastrointestinal neoplasms: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Surgical endoscopy · 2017Pooled it
- Cold Resection for Superficial Non-Ampullary Duodenal Epithelial Tumors: Current Evidence and Clinical Perspectives.DEN open · 2027Review
- Real-World Data of Comprehensive Genomic Profiles and Clinicopathological Characteristics of Duodenal Epithelial Neoplasms.Cancers · 2026Article
- Diagnostic performance of indigo carmine-assisted texture and color enhanced magnified imaging for superficial non-ampullary duodenal epithelial tumors.Therapeutic advances in gastroenterology · 2026Article
- Clinicopathological and Endoscopic Features of Non-Ampullary Duodenal Epithelial Tumors with Gastrointestinal Mixed Phenotype.Digestion · 2026Article
- Four cases of early stage poorly differentiated non-ampullary duodenal adenocarcinoma: a case report.Clinical journal of gastroenterology · 2025Article
- Safety of cold resection of non-ampullary duodenal polyps: Systematic review and meta-analysis.Endoscopy international open · 2024Article
- Usefulness of the S-O clip for duodenal endoscopic submucosal dissection: a propensity score-matched study.Clinical endoscopy · 2023Article
- Endoscopic diagnosis and treatment of superficial non-ampullary duodenal epithelial tumors: A review.Journal of translational internal medicine · 2023Article
- A narrative review: narrow-band imaging endoscopic classifications.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2023Review
- Usefulness of magnifying endoscopy with acetic acid and narrow-band imaging for the diagnosis of duodenal neoplasms: proposal of a diagnostic algorithm.Surgical endoscopy · 2022Article
- Prospective multicenter study of the efficacy and safety of cold forceps polypectomy for ≤ 6-mm non-ampullary duodenal low-grade adenomas.Endoscopy international open · 2022Article
- Article
- Rare resected eight cases of duodenal adenocarcinomas.International journal of surgery case reports · 2021Article
- Large duodenal pyloric gland adenoma successfully resected by endoscopic submucosal dissection.Clinical journal of gastroenterology · 2021Article
- Stop taking routine biopsy specimens for the diagnose of a duodenal adenoma!Endoscopy international open · 2021Article
- Does previous biopsy lead to cancer overdiagnosis of superficial non-ampullary duodenal epithelial tumors?Endoscopy international open · 2021Article
- Endoscopic and Clinicopathological Features of Superficial Non-Ampullary Duodenal Tumor Based on the Mucin Phenotypes.Digestion · 2021Article
- Successful endoscopic mucosal resection for non-ampullary duodenal signet-ring cell carcinoma.Clinical journal of gastroenterology · 2020Article
- Linked color imaging can improve the visibility of superficial non-ampullary duodenal epithelial tumors.Scientific reports · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Superficial non-ampullary duodenal epithelial tumor (SNADET) is defined as a sporadic tumor that is confined to the mucosa or submucosa that does not arise from Vater's papilla, and it includes adenoma and adenocarcinoma. Recent developments in endoscopic technology, such as high-resolution endoscopy and image-enhanced endoscopy, may increase the chances of detecting SNADET lesions. However, because SNADET is rare, little is known about its preoperative endoscopic diagnosis. The use of endoscopic resection for SNADET, which has no risk of metastasis, is increasing, but the incidence of complications, such as perforation, is significantly higher than in any other part of the digestive tract. A preoperative diagnosis is required to distinguish between lesions that should be followed up and those that require treatment. Retrospective studies have revealed certain endoscopic findings that suggest malignancy. In recent years, several new imaging modalities have been developed and explored for real-time diagnosis of these lesion types. Establishing an endoscopic diagnostic tool to differentiate between adenoma and adenocarcinoma in SNADET lesions is required to select the most appropriate treatment. This review describes the current state of knowledge about preoperative endoscopic diagnosis of SNADETs, such as duodenal adenoma and duodenal adenocarcinoma. Newer endoscopic techniques, including magnifying endoscopy, may help to guide these diagnostics, but their additional advantages remain unclear, and further studies are required to clarify these issues.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.