Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26556991›Full record

ReviewWorld journal of gastroenterology2015

Second-line treatment of metastatic gastric cancer: Current options and future directions.

Dheepak Kanagavel, Mikhail Fedyanin, Alexey Tryakin, Sergei Tjulandin

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in World journal of gastroenterology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Immunotherapy for metastatic gastric cancer.World journal of gastrointestinal surgery · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Prognostic Significance of p27 and Survivin in H. pylori Gastritis and Gastric Cancer.Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP · 2021
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Ramucirumab for the treatment of patients with gastric or gastroesophageal junction cancer in community oncology practices.Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association · 2018
    Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Dheepak KanagavelDheepak Kanagavel, Mikhail Fedyanin, Alexey Tryakin, Sergei Tjulandin, Department of Clinical Pharmacology and Chemotherapy, N. N. Blokhin Russian Cancer Research Center, Moscow 115478, Russia.
Mikhail FedyaninDheepak Kanagavel, Mikhail Fedyanin, Alexey Tryakin, Sergei Tjulandin, Department of Clinical Pharmacology and Chemotherapy, N. N. Blokhin Russian Cancer Research Center, Moscow 115478, Russia.
Alexey TryakinDheepak Kanagavel, Mikhail Fedyanin, Alexey Tryakin, Sergei Tjulandin, Department of Clinical Pharmacology and Chemotherapy, N. N. Blokhin Russian Cancer Research Center, Moscow 115478, Russia.
Sergei TjulandinDheepak Kanagavel, Mikhail Fedyanin, Alexey Tryakin, Sergei Tjulandin, Department of Clinical Pharmacology and Chemotherapy, N. N. Blokhin Russian Cancer Research Center, Moscow 115478, Russia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gastric cancer remains one among the leading causes of cancer-related deaths, regardless of its decreasing incidence and newly available treatment options. Most patients present at an advanced stage and are treated with upfront systemic chemotherapy. Those patients receiving first-line therapy may initially respond to treatment, but many of them relapse over time. In such condition, second-line treatment for disease progression remains the only available option. Although there exists no standard approach in the second-line setting, several phase III trials have shown modest survival benefit in patients receiving irinotecan, taxane and ramucirumab over the best supportive care or active agents. This review analyzes the currently available treatment regimens and future directions of research in the second-line setting for metastatic gastric cancer with the best available evidence. Additionally, the prognostic factors that influence patient survival in those receiving second-line therapy are discussed.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsBiomarkers, TumorHumansNeoplasm MetastasisPrecision MedicineRetreatmentRisk FactorsStomach NeoplasmsTreatment OutcomeBiomarkers, TumorIrinotecanMetastatic gastric cancerRamucirumabSecond-line chemotherapyTargeted therapyTaxane

Identifiers

PMID26556991
PMCPMC4631965

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.