Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26556935›Full record

ArticlePublic health reports (Washington, D.C. : 1974)

Infant Mortality: Development of a Proposed Update to the Dollfus Classification of Infant Deaths.

Ann M Nakamura, Melanie S Dove, Archana Minnal, Mark Damesyn, Michael P Curtis

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Public health reports (Washington, D.C. : 1974). The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Classifying Infant Deaths with a Focus on Prevention Strategies.Public health reports (Washington, D.C. : 1974)
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ann M NakamuraCalifornia Department of Public Health; Maternal, Child and Adolescent Health Program; Epidemiology, Assessment and Program Development Branch; Epidemiology, Evaluation, and Data Operations Section, Sacramento, CA.
Melanie S DoveCalifornia Department of Public Health, Maternal, Child and Adolescent Health Program; Epidemiology, Assessment and Program Development Branch; Surveillance, Assessment and Program Development Section, Sacramento, CA.
Archana MinnalCalifornia Department of Public Health, Maternal, Child and Adolescent Health Program; Epidemiology, Assessment and Program Development Branch; Surveillance, Assessment and Program Development Section, Sacramento, CA.
Mark DamesynCalifornia Department of Public Health; Maternal, Child and Adolescent Health Program; Epidemiology, Assessment and Program Development Branch; Epidemiology, Evaluation, and Data Operations Section, Sacramento, CA.
Michael P CurtisCalifornia Department of Public Health, Maternal, Child and Adolescent Health Program; Epidemiology, Assessment and Program Development Branch; Surveillance, Assessment and Program Development Section, Sacramento, CA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveIdentifying infant deaths with common underlying causes and potential intervention points is critical to infant mortality surveillance and the development of prevention strategies. We constructed an International Classification of Diseases 10th Revision (ICD-10) parallel to the Dollfus cause-of-death classification scheme first published in 1990, which organized infant deaths by etiology and their amenability to prevention efforts.

methodsInfant death records for 1996, dual-coded to the ICD Ninth Revision (ICD-9) and ICD-10, were obtained from the CDC public-use multiple-cause-of-death file on comparability between ICD-9 and ICD-10. We used the underlying cause of death to group 27,821 infant deaths into the nine categories of the ICD-9-based update to Dollfus' original coding scheme, published by Sowards in 1999. Comparability ratios were computed to measure concordance between ICD versions.

resultsThe Dollfus classification system updated with ICD-10 codes had limited agreement with the 1999 modified classification system. Although prematurity, congenital malformations, Sudden Infant Death Syndrome, and obstetric conditions were the first through fourth most common causes of infant death under both systems, most comparability ratios were significantly different from one system to the other.

conclusionThe Dollfus classification system can be adapted for use with ICD-10 codes to create a comprehensive, etiology-based profile of infant deaths. The potential benefits of using Dollfus logic to guide perinatal mortality reduction strategies, particularly to maternal and child health programs and other initiatives focused on improving infant health, warrant further examination of this method's use in perinatal mortality surveillance.

Indexed as

Clinical CodingInternational Classification of DiseasesCause of DeathHumansInfantInfant Death

Identifiers

PMID26556935
PMCPMC4612172

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.