Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26556905›Full record

ArticleGeburtshilfe und Frauenheilkunde2015

Statement by the Kommission Ovar of the AGO: The New FIGO and WHO Classifications of Ovarian, Fallopian Tube and Primary Peritoneal Cancer.

I Meinhold-Heerlein, C Fotopoulou, P Harter, C Kurzeder, A Mustea, P Wimberger, S Hauptmann, J Sehouli, Kommission Ovar of the AGO

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Geburtshilfe und Frauenheilkunde, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. A bioinformatics approach to identify potential biomarkers of high-grade ovarian cancer.Journal of the Turkish German Gynecological Association · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Heterogeneity and treatment landscape of ovarian carcinoma.Nature reviews. Clinical oncology · 2023
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

I Meinhold-HeerleinGynäkologie und Geburtsmedizin, Uniklinik RWTH Aachen, Aachen.
C FotopoulouGynäkologie, Universitätsmedizin Charité, Berlin.
P HarterGynäkologie und Gyn. Onkologie, Kliniken Essen-Mitte, Essen.
C KurzederGynäkologie und Gyn. Onkologie, Kliniken Essen-Mitte, Essen.
A MusteaGynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Universitätsmedizin Greifswald, Greifswald.
P WimbergerGynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden.
S HauptmannMVZ für Gynäkologie, Zytologie und Histologie Homburg (Saar), Homburg.
J SehouliGynäkologie, Universitätsmedizin Charité, Berlin.
Kommission Ovar of the AGO
Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin · DEKliniken Essen-Mitte · DETechnische Universität Dresden · DEUniversitätsklinikum Aachen · DEUniversitätsmedizin Greifswald · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

More than 25 years after the last revision, in 2012 the FIGO Oncology Committee began revising the FIGO classification for staging ovarian, Fallopian tube and primary peritoneal cancers. The new classification has become effective with its publication at the beginning of 2014. Following recent findings on the pathogenesis of ovarian, Fallopian tube and primary peritoneal cancer and reflecting standard clinical practice, the three entities have now been classified uniformly. The histological subtype is included (high-grade serous - HGSC; low-grade serous - LGSC; mucinous - MC; clear cell - CCC; endometrioid - EC). Stages III and IV have been fundamentally changed: stage IIIA now refers to a localized tumor limited to the pelvis with (only) retroperitoneal lymph node metastasis (formerly classified as IIIC). Stage IV has been divided into IVA and IVB, with IVA defined as malignant pleural effusion and IVB as parenchymatous or extra-abdominal metastasis including inguinal and mediastinal lymph node metastasis as well as umbilical metastasis. A new WHO classification was published almost concurrently. The classification of serous tumors addresses the issue of the tubal carcinogenesis of serous ovarian cancer, even if no tubal precursor lesions are found for up to 30 % of serous high-grade cancers. The number of subgroups was reduced and subgroups now include only high-grade serous, low-grade serous, mucinous, seromucinous, endometrioid, clear cell and Brenner tumors. The category "transitional cell carcinomas" has been dropped and the classification "seromucinous tumors" has been newly added. More attention has been focused on the role of borderline tumors as a stage in the progression from benign to invasive lesions.

Indexed as

borderline tumorFIGO stageovarian cancer subtypes

Identifiers

PMID26556905
PMCPMC4629993
OpenAlexW2266518054

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.