ArticlePLoS biology2015
Correction: Risk of Bias in Reports of In Vivo Research: A Focus for Improvement.
Article in PLoS biology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Reporting quality in preclinical animal experimental research in 2009 and 2018: A nationwide systematic investigation.PloS one · 2022Pooled it
- More ethics in the laboratory, please! Scientists' perspectives on ethics in the preclinical phase.Accountability in research · 2025Article
- Statistics, statistical thinking, and the IACUC.Lab animal · 2021Article
- The Embryonic Chick Femur Organotypic Model as a Tool to Analyze the Angiotensin II Axis on Bone Tissue.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Prestigious Science Journals Struggle to Reach Even Average Reliability.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2018Review
Corrections and comments
- Erratum forRisk of Bias in Reports of In Vivo Research: A Focus for Improvement.2015 · Baginskitae, Julija [corrected to Baginskaite, Julija]
Authors and funding
19 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
[This corrects the article DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1002273.].
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.