Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26556628›Full record

ArticleGenome biology2015

CRISPR/Cas9-mediated viral interference in plants.

Zahir Ali, Aala Abulfaraj, Ali Idris, Shakila Ali, Manal Tashkandi, Magdy M Mahfouz

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome biology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 180 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
180citing papers in PubMed
19.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

180 citing papers in PubMed, 497 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Advances in CRISPR Plant Applications.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Genome editing of susceptibility geneFrontiers in plant science · 2026
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Strategies for plant-virus disease management from gene editing to nanotechnology.Physiology and molecular biology of plants : an international journal of functional plant biology · 2025
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article

120 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

  • Commented on by
5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Zahir AliLaboratory for Genome Engineering, Center for Desert Agriculture & Division of Biological Sciences, 4700 King Abdullah University of Science and Technology, Thuwal, 23955-6900, Saudi Arabia.
Aala AbulfarajLaboratory for Genome Engineering, Center for Desert Agriculture & Division of Biological Sciences, 4700 King Abdullah University of Science and Technology, Thuwal, 23955-6900, Saudi Arabia.
Ali IdrisLaboratory for Genome Engineering, Center for Desert Agriculture & Division of Biological Sciences, 4700 King Abdullah University of Science and Technology, Thuwal, 23955-6900, Saudi Arabia.
Shakila AliLaboratory for Genome Engineering, Center for Desert Agriculture & Division of Biological Sciences, 4700 King Abdullah University of Science and Technology, Thuwal, 23955-6900, Saudi Arabia.
Manal TashkandiLaboratory for Genome Engineering, Center for Desert Agriculture & Division of Biological Sciences, 4700 King Abdullah University of Science and Technology, Thuwal, 23955-6900, Saudi Arabia.
Magdy M MahfouzLaboratory for Genome Engineering, Center for Desert Agriculture & Division of Biological Sciences, 4700 King Abdullah University of Science and Technology, Thuwal, 23955-6900, Saudi Arabia. magdy.mahfouz@kaust.edu.sa.
King Abdullah University of Science and Technology · SA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe CRISPR/Cas9 system provides bacteria and archaea with molecular immunity against invading phages and conjugative plasmids. Recently, CRISPR/Cas9 has been used for targeted genome editing in diverse eukaryotic species.

resultsIn this study, we investigate whether the CRISPR/Cas9 system could be used in plants to confer molecular immunity against DNA viruses. We deliver sgRNAs specific for coding and non-coding sequences of tomato yellow leaf curl virus (TYLCV) into Nicotiana benthamiana plants stably overexpressing the Cas9 endonuclease, and subsequently challenge these plants with TYLCV. Our data demonstrate that the CRISPR/Cas9 system targeted TYLCV for degradation and introduced mutations at the target sequences. All tested sgRNAs exhibit interference activity, but those targeting the stem-loop sequence within the TYLCV origin of replication in the intergenic region (IR) are the most effective. N. benthamiana plants expressing CRISPR/Cas9 exhibit delayed or reduced accumulation of viral DNA, abolishing or significantly attenuating symptoms of infection. Moreover, this system could simultaneously target multiple DNA viruses.

conclusionsThese data establish the efficacy of the CRISPR/Cas9 system for viral interference in plants, thereby extending the utility of this technology and opening the possibility of producing plants resistant to multiple viral infections.

Indexed as

CRISPR-Cas SystemsBegomovirusCRISPR-Associated ProteinsDisease ResistanceEndodeoxyribonucleasesGenome, ViralNicotianaPlant DiseasesCRISPR-Associated ProteinsEndodeoxyribonucleases

Identifiers

PMID26556628
PMCPMC4641396
OpenAlexW2176976665

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.