Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26556299›Full record

ArticleJAMA oncology2016

Germline Variants in Targeted Tumor Sequencing Using Matched Normal DNA.

Kasmintan A Schrader, Donavan T Cheng, Vijai Joseph, Meera Prasad, Michael Walsh, Ahmet Zehir, Ai Ni, Tinu Thomas, Ryma Benayed, Asad Ashraf and 12 more

Erratum issued 2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA oncology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 199 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
199citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
9.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04533555 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2020, after this paper: background citation

Randomized Trial of Universal vs. Guideline-directed Germline Testing Among Young Adults With Cancer

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of PennsylvaniaRan2020 to 2025Enrolled749ConditionsCancerArmsBroad gene panel for young adult cancers, Standard
NCT06476938 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Testing the Efficacy of an eHealth Decision Support Tool to Help Latinx Cancer Patients Make Informed Decisions About Tumor Genomic Testing

TypeinterventionalSponsorFox Chase Cancer CenterRan2025 to 2027Enrolled232ConditionsCancerArmsGene PilotLX
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

199 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 339 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Role of Genetic Testing for Inherited Prostate Cancer Risk: Philadelphia Prostate Cancer Consensus Conference 2017.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2018
    Guideline
  2. Trial
  3. Enhancing Radioiodine Incorporation inThyroid : official journal of the American Thyroid Association · 2022
    Trial
  4. Phase II Study of Lenvatinib in Patients With Progressive, Recurrent or Metastatic Adenoid Cystic Carcinoma.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2019
    Trial
  5. Alterations in DNA Damage Response and Repair Genes as Potential Marker of Clinical Benefit From PD-1/PD-L1 Blockade in Advanced Urothelial Cancers.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2018
    Trial
  6. A phase II study of axitinib (AG-013736) in patients with incurable adenoid cystic carcinoma.Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology · 2016
    Trial
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

139 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Kasmintan A SchraderDepartment of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York2Department of Molecular Oncology, BC Cancer Agency, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada3Department of Medical Genetics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British C.
Donavan T ChengDepartment of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Vijai JosephDepartment of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York5Cancer Biology and Genetics Program, Sloan Kettering Institute, New York, New York.
Meera PrasadDepartment of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Michael WalshClinical Genetics Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering, New York, New York7Department of Pediatrics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Ahmet ZehirDepartment of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Ai NiDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Tinu ThomasClinical Genetics Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering, New York, New York.
Ryma BenayedDepartment of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Asad AshrafDepartment of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Annie LincolnDepartment of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Maria ArcilaDepartment of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Zsofia StadlerDepartment of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York6Clinical Genetics Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering, New York, New York.
David SolitDepartment of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York9Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York10Human Oncology and Pathogenesis Program, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York11Center for Molecular.
David M Hyman
David HymanDepartment of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Liying ZhangDepartment of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
David KlimstraDepartment of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Marc LadanyiDepartment of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York10Human Oncology and Pathogenesis Program, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Kenneth OffitDepartment of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York5Cancer Biology and Genetics Program, Sloan Kettering Institute, New York, New York6Clinical Genetics Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering, New York, Ne.
Michael BergerDepartment of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York9Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York10Human Oncology and Pathogenesis Program, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York11Center for Molecula.
Mark RobsonDepartment of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York6Clinical Genetics Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering, New York, New York9Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York.
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · USCornell University · US

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Nicholas D Socci · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
Canadian Institutes of Health ResearchNCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

importanceTumor genetic sequencing identifies potentially targetable genetic alterations with therapeutic implications. Analysis has concentrated on detecting tumor-specific variants, but recognition of germline variants may prove valuable as well.

objectiveTo estimate the burden of germline variants identified through routine clinical tumor sequencing. DESIGN, SETTING, AND

participantsPatients with advanced cancer diagnoses eligible for studies of targeted agents at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center are offered tumor-normal sequencing with MSK-IMPACT, a 341-gene panel. We surveyed the germline variants seen in 187 overlapping genes with Mendelian disease associations in 1566 patients who had undergone tumor profiling between March and October 2014. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The number of presumed pathogenic germline variants (PPGVs) and variants of uncertain significance per person in 187 genes associated with single-gene disorders and the proportions of individuals with PPGVs in clinically relevant gene subsets, in genes consistent with known tumor phenotypes, and in genes with evidence of second somatic hits in their tumors.

resultsThe mean age of the 1566 patients was 58 years, and 54% were women. Presumed pathogenic germline variants in known Mendelian disease-associated genes were identified in 246 of 1566 patients (15.7%; 95% CI, 14.0%-17.6%), including 198 individuals with mutations in genes associated with cancer susceptibility. Germline findings in cancer susceptibility genes were concordant with the individual's cancer type in only 81 of 198 cases (40.9%; 95% CI, 34.3%-47.9%). In individuals with PPGVs retained in the tumor, somatic alteration of the other allele was seen in 39 of 182 cases (21.4%; 95% CI, 16.1%-28.0%), of which 13 cases did not show a known correlation of the germline mutation and a known syndrome. Mutations in non-cancer-related Mendelian disease genes were seen in 55 of 1566 cases (3.5%; 95% CI, 27.1%-45.4%). Almost every individual had more than 1 variant of uncertain significance (1565 of 1566 patients; 99.9%; 95% CI, 99.6%-99.9%). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Germline variants are common in individuals undergoing tumor-normal sequencing and may reveal otherwise unsuspected syndromic associations.

Indexed as

Germ-Line MutationAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBiomarkers, TumorDNA Mutational AnalysisFemaleGene Expression ProfilingGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseHumansMaleMiddle AgedModels, GeneticNeoplasmsNew York CityPhenotypeBiomarkers, Tumor

Identifiers

PMID26556299
PMCPMC5477989
OpenAlexW2190282709

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.